• Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 days ago

      His ideas are fantastic. Execution and characterization are spotty. Been a while since I read anything of his, but IIRC, he has a tendency to dip into surrealism or absurdity that feels cringey instead of his artistic target.

      In some ways, it’s similar to a lot of Golden Era SF. You read it for the ideas, not the story.

      I do have a favorable opinion of him and his work. I’d really enjoy Doctorow being paired with a traditional fiction author and both being rode herd by a hardass SF editor.

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      I find the non-fiction stuff he writes good (e.g. The Internet Con, Chokepoint Capitalism). I believe this book is like that?

      I found his fiction, based on the one book (The Lost Cause) I read, to be a bit juvenile in style (as in feels like a young adults kind of book) to the point I didn’t quite enjoy it, although the topics are interesting enough.

    • Localhorst86@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      personally i read “Down and Out in the magic Kingdom” as well as the german translation “Backup”, which - while not masterpieces - were quite enjoyable.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I highly recommend the recent episode of the QAA podcast with Doctrow, it’s an amazing listen!