This kind of already happens there though. Video view counts are visible and often way below a channel’s sub count.
Sure, there are exceptions (viral video views often far exceeding the sub count), but by and large they’re a good metric for seeing how a channel is actually doing.
That’s news to me. They took away subscriber numbers? YouTubers still talk about them.
And this is the number behind the plaques they send out to people. I can’t image them stopping that. They won’t send plaques based on weekly average activity numbers.
seems to make sense on the surface. inactive users are kind of a useless metric.
This is an issue with Lemmy too. Searching for a community by keyword ranks the results list by subscribers not by MAUs
Sort by “Top-Month”
Subscriber count is also used in fields that cannot be sorted (e.g. when searching for a community for cross-posting).
lol, watch YouTube do the same and creators flip the fuck out.
This kind of already happens there though. Video view counts are visible and often way below a channel’s sub count.
Sure, there are exceptions (viral video views often far exceeding the sub count), but by and large they’re a good metric for seeing how a channel is actually doing.
Yeah, you can infer it.
But no one is making a thank you video because they reached a weekly active users metric.
I thought they already are doing that?
That’s news to me. They took away subscriber numbers? YouTubers still talk about them.
And this is the number behind the plaques they send out to people. I can’t image them stopping that. They won’t send plaques based on weekly average activity numbers.
I was thinking of the drop in views that some creators are reporting… not subscribers. My bad!