• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait…
    Excluding half of the active PCs or so from upgrade due to arbitrary hardware constraints didn’t push upgrading?
    How can this be??? 😯🫢

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        First major requirement is the presence of a recent TPM module, which is absolutely not required performance-wise, but only for DRM-reasons (and read that as “Digital Restriction Management”).
        Second even more arbitrary one is that they excluded all CPUs before at least Coffee Lake generation. Perhaps half of the PC stuff people I know to be running at home is still from the mid-2010s, so practically completely pre-Coffee-Lake.
        And the IT infrastructure of the e.g. the German executive government branches is on average probably more in the range of 15 years old. A surprising lot of that isn’t even fully switched to Windows 10 yet… (hey, at least we are increasingly migrating away from Telefax…!)

        • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          TPM is a good ideas but hardly seems like a requirement.

          Microsoft should just tell OEMs they can’t sell windows pre installed without TPM hardware.

          • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I agree that would have been the sensible way to go… Together with an “Install at your own risk” message when trying to upgrade a PC containing an older CPU…
            I really don’t know what their reasoning is to enforce the requirements so hard for everyone.