• AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Chemically, Sodium and Lithium are very similar, so any improvement that applies to one should be pretty applicable to the other. That’s actually one of the main strengths of Sodium batteries - most of the research that’s already gone into making Lithium batteries can be reapplied with minor tweaks. However, Sodium is inherently larger and heavier than Lithium, with fewer atoms fitting into the same space and those atoms weighing more. If research for Sodium batteries catches up with Lithium ones, they’ll still be worse just because of that, and at that point, research would get easier gains from improving Lithium batteries than Sodium ones.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are assuming there will not be different sodium compounds.

      Already, sodium chemistry works better in cold, and sodium batteries can charge faster.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are correct, and the critical number is that sodium is over 3 times as massive as equivalent lithium.

      But to keep in perspective, we are talking about an element that’s only about 5-7% of a pack, so theoretically you could maybe get to only 10-15% more massive as a penalty for swapping out lithium. Which is some applications is still unacceptable,but broadly we have seen a lot of accepting that same tradeoff going from NMC to LFP…