It’s amazing what a difference a little bit of time can make: Two years after kicking off what looked to be a long-shot campaign to push back on the practice of shutting down server-dependent videogames once they’re no longer profitable, Stop Killing Games founder Ross Scott and organizer Moritz Katzner appeared in front of the European Parliament to present their case—and it seemed to go very well.

Official Stream: https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/committee-on-internal-market-and-consumer-protection-ordinary-meeting-committee-on-legal-affairs-com_20260416-1100-COMMITTEE-IMCO-JURI-PETI

Digital Fairness Act: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14622-Digital-Fairness-Act/F33096034_en

  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    No, this is like a law that says once you paid for the guac they can’t come around to your table later and piss in it to make you buy a new pot of the new and improved guac they just released.

    • NostraDavid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I was thinking along the line of them yoinking the guac right from under your nose, even if you weren’t finished yet.

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Feels to me more like kicking you out of Chipotle at closing time.

      Servers cost money. Making server side code available takes effort and money. It’s the issue of positive versus negative rights. The difference between being entitled to food stamps (you have to give me) versus having the right to hunt (you have to let me). Of course we have food stamps, but that’s funded by the government, it’s not an obligation for grocery stores to give food away.

      The point of the guac analogy is the entitlement to say that you as a consumer gets to dictate a price singlehandedly.