• da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can we please stop using football pitches as a measurement? Using fucking hectares (or acres) or at least square kilometres when you talk about land sizes like every normal person.

    The bad thing about football pitches is, that they dont have a standard size.

    • Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Football pitches (european football ones) do have a standard size, as defined by the Laws of the Game, 105×68m

      • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting, i looked it up and at least for the German “Bundesliga” (national league) it does not have a standard size. Also the sizes vary for German and international matches.

        At least that’s what their official website says.

  • RedPandaRaider@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Can we not use football fields and such as measurements like filthy Americans? Especially in a freaking academic context.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Europe loses about 1,500 sq km (580 sq miles) a year to construction. About 9,000 sq km of land – an area the size of Cyprus – was turned green to grey between 2018 and 2023, according to the data. That is the equivalent of almost 30 sq km a week, or 600 football pitches a day.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        A great example of why football pitches are used. People cannot visualize an area of 1500 km², because nobody has ever seen such an area while being aware/told that that is the size of said area.

        Most people in Europe knows roughly how large a football pitch is, and might even be able to visualize an area covered by 600 of those.

        Although I guess “4km²/day” isn’t that bad to visualize either.

        • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          People cannot visualize an area of 1500 km²

          That’s where hectares are useful and a sensible, well known metric.

          • mhague@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            How do you guys reach a point where you’re arguing for less effective science communication? They’re summing up values as universally recognized objects. Wow! That sounds like the perfect way to communicate with people.

            It’s such a no brainer. The “anything but metric” meme turned people into dorks.

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Only downside is, that most people usually dont know how mich a hectare is. It usually only gets used in the context of farming (at least I havent heard it outside that context)