Title of the (concerning) thread on their community forum, not voluntary clickbait. Came across the thread thanks to a toot by @Khrys@mamot.fr (French speaking)

The gist of the issue raised by OP is that framework sponsors and promotes projects lead by known toxic and racists people (DHH among them).

I agree with the point made by the OP :

The “big tent” argument works fine if everyone plays by some basic civil rules of understanding. Stuff like code of conducts, moderation, anti-racism, surely those things we agree on? A big tent won’t work if you let in people that want to exterminate the others.

I’m disappointed in framework’s answer so far

  • nroth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    Projects are not their authors. Please give the politics a rest. I’ve had enough of politics lately.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      you can give politics a rest, but politics won’t give you a rest. especially if you are gay, trans, black, or in any of those marginalized groups.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Amen. I get the sentiment but Jesus Christ everything is politics when you boil it down. Yes it’s draining to focus on it 24/7 but it’s equally destructive to bury your head in the sand.

    • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sadly, the official discord server appears to also be a cesspool. So the community is also not that great

      Which sucks, because omarchy seems to be quite nice

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s become all about purity testing. From both the right and the left. And since any purity test can be anything that anyone wants it be, everyone is guaranteed to fail it at some point. And because the internet never forgets, something you said 20 years ago now is grounds for being purged. Without any thought to what that person now believes and how they think.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Is this situation relevant to that example? Are the people in question changed since the time in which the accusations were made?

        Rebranding personal ethics and morals as “a purity test” is disingenuous at best.

        If you’re going to take umbridge with someone’s approach at least do it directly instead of this backhanded high horse bullshit.

      • moderatecentrist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve been thinking similar things. Maybe online platforms, including Lemmy, can be a bit unhealthy.

        In the real world, if you say something a bit embarrassing in front of one person, they’ll probably forget it after a while. Years later, nobody knows you said it. But on Lemmy, if I tell one person my opinion on a topic, that opinion exists on my profile for the rest of time, unless I delete the comment or my profile.