The reason why I can’t stand LLMs is because they congratulate me before replying to anything I say. This could be a good thing.
That’s a great point – and an important distinction.
OpenAI is full of shit, as usual. They want engagement and they need revenue. They’ll do whatever it takes to get those things. Political ideology and sociological ramifications are an afterthought.
Political ideology and sociological ramifications are
an afterthoughtfor sale
Private equity having a normal one
Somewhere, sometime, ChatGPT is telling the stupidest person in the world “Yes, you are absolutely correct!”
Don’t they watch South Park: if they want to know how to do that, “Dude, just ask ChatGPT”.
How does one even do that in a conversation centered on such things? These are conversations with the bot. So it’s analogous.
Does it just refuse to interact? Does it just info dump and list all sides of the issue exhaustively?
I’m sure I’m working under a weird limited view, but it just does not seem possible to do this without things being awkward, or, without it being designed around its own agenda.
