• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Also, thinking 40GB fits 10 FLAC albums is stupid.

    Sorry, you’re right; it’s more like around 20 of mine.

    I can’t imagine putting this much effort into complaining about someone using their media player of choice.

    I’m not complaining about their media player of choice; I’m remarking that the way they chose to discuss it in this article – especially one so focused on streaming – is stupid as fuck. Like 50% of this article is spent bitching about non-issues with phones. I don’t even mean “non-issues” in the sense that they don’t annoy me personally; I mean “non-issues” in the sense that this devolves into a comparison not of iPod versus smartphone but of iPod versus streaming, or that they’re talking about it being so convenient not to have to worry about charging a second device.

    You’re not considering the iPod DAC which is higher quality than most cellphone DACs.

    The author of this article certainly did consider DACs: [Modern smartphones have] got […] a DAC chip that is by all measures transparent, near-lossless wireless streaming […]" and that’s the last they mention of the DAC, so they clearly don’t give a shit about the Wolfson.

    Also, thinking 40GB fits 10 FLAC albums is stupid.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ain’t no way your FLAC albums are larger than uncompressed WAV. The only >2GB FLAC albums I have are massive compilations with 50+ tracks. They’re smaller than WAV, and that’s at max 700MB per CD. Spot checking, it looks like most of mine are ~500MB per album.