• GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Until you get older, and there is no workforce that pays for your medical bills that increase with age, your pension or just no people to staff hospitals and age care facilities.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yes because China 1 child policy could never have such an effect.
      Russia too has extremely low fertility rate too, (also before the war) Of around 1.4, where the necessary number to sustain the population is 2.1.

      ALL developed countries have this problem.

      So please come again and explain more clearly what it is you actually mean by the above moronic comment.
      Is it that truly communist/socialist countries remain poor with short lifespans, and thereby maintain their fertility rate?

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Because there is no capitalism in Russia or China? Last time I checked they are very much capitalist countries since more than 40 years now. And the one child policy is basically abolished in China, which no real effect on the low number of children born.

          • Monkyhands@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            To my mind, it is one we could build together, through collaboration and solidarity perhaps

                • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  No capitalism is about free markets, democracy is a form of governance.
                  When China introduced their 1 child policy they did not have free markets, and Russia didn’t have free markets for 100 years.

                  And neither of those countries are doing any better regarding fertility rate than many traditional capitalist countries.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Nah, boomers can die of unnatural causes too and that’s also okay… Get some wealth distribution in this capitalism…

  • SunshineJogger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Hopefully it means change.

    Universal basic income and a 4 day work week would be a good start.

    There is more than enough wealth and automation going around for this to be workable these days.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    There’s more resources to go around, less damage to the planet.

    And billionaires make less money (relatively).