The call system we have at work has an option for a “minimum queue time”
So you can make sure that people always have to wait at least a certain amount of time, even with free agents.
(My guess, best case scenario) Make queue times during non-busy hours more similar to the queue times during busy hours, so that there doesn’t seem to be a “better” time of day to call, hopefully spreading the call volume throughout the day and creating a more consistent wait time when calling (even if that means the experience is worse than actually necessary at times).
At least that’s probably how someone in management sold the idea.
expectation management: sometimes call volume is genuinely high, and if you set a floor at say 10 minutes it only feels like a 5 minute difference if the caller’s actual wait time is 15
engineering downtime to allow agents time to complete paperwork or catch up on emails
make us all so annoyed with the process of waiting in line we welcome AI agents as liberators
They intentionally add the background noise in.
Do they? That makes me incredibly angry.
Here’s something more to annoy you:
The call system we have at work has an option for a “minimum queue time” So you can make sure that people always have to wait at least a certain amount of time, even with free agents.
Can we make arson legally allowable for these cases?
Are you aware of the reason(s) for this? To discourage would be callers from following through?
(My guess, best case scenario) Make queue times during non-busy hours more similar to the queue times during busy hours, so that there doesn’t seem to be a “better” time of day to call, hopefully spreading the call volume throughout the day and creating a more consistent wait time when calling (even if that means the experience is worse than actually necessary at times).
At least that’s probably how someone in management sold the idea.
I can think of a couple
I’m sure it’s to give you a sense of “pride and accomplishment” when you
give up and fix it yourself“adopt digital self‑solve”.