I absolutely agree with that. The algorithms are one of the significant promoters of destabilization, propaganda, disorientation, and manipulation, by platforms and by other parties making use of them.
It is essential for the EU to regulate them. Through transparency and requirements, and adequate consequences.
It was one of my points in the EU survey response and content about it here on Lemmy https://feddit.org/post/10253134/5842417
That seems wasteful
There’s alternatives, and taxes don’t prevent use in the first place.
Public data or Facebook data?
Looking around and in the terms
Europe Pub is operated and sponsored by Tobias Feistmantl, with servers hosted by Hetzner in Germany and is governed by Austrian law.
Yeah, looks like a single person and consequently a single point of failure.
how does it make any sense to increase LNG imports by 15-20 times while claiming to decarbonize?
You mean from EU side? I don’t think Trump cares about decarbonization or EU efforts regarding it.
A big problem with many people moving out is that they will be missing as opposition and reason. To a degree, it reduces the chances of the US to reform itself.
"That’s what I hope occurs, and also more freedom of people to move between Europe and North America if they wish,
Maybe he realized how he fucked up, associating with the wrong people? Finally awoke from his ego-centric spree and dilution now that some time has passed and the effects are obvious?
He’s saying the complete opposite of what they have been doing and putting into effect for many weeks. Him being a central part of that. Insane.
They got divorced separated?
I only read about “DOGE” having “finished its job” or sth.
What do you mean? The Brexiters wanted free trade with the EU, so they left the union? I don’t see how that makes any sense.
shouldn’t they be called Elmu?
The GDPR requires data portability. That you can export your data in a reasonable machine-readable format.
Expanding that to protocols is an interesting extension of that thought and policy.
Isn’t there already a requirement of mobile messengers where Apple had to open their messaging to Google but do it in a lackluster way? I don’t remember the specifics.
I filled it out. Did have some additional comments I added. In the conclusion I raised two other related points not referenced in the questionaire.
I think the most efficient (considering effectiveness, viability, and implementation effort) approaches would be
Took me about 30 min to fill out (:
not counting the time of confusion before that - I was also very confuse by the page layout and content and give feedback section and form.
What a shit cookie banner…
The list of cookies is huge, in a table that doesn’t even fit the page. What the heck would “all” be? Guess I have to choose “essential only”.
What the heck is with this blurry graph rendering?
The page layout is soo confusing.
The PDF and “go to consultation” are the primary elements, but that was not obvious to me at all.
Why is “Give Feedback” above all of those? :-/
/edit: Looks like when you reach the questionnaire the intro means you don’t even need to read the pdf beforehand.
You’re arguing for a democracy without a Justice system?
An independent Justice system is fundamental to a working, healthy democracy.
Just look around to where and how Justice system is weakened by political parties and it’s always developing into autocracy and oppression.
the very basics of diplomacy.
The very basics of human decency
It isn’t.
You don’t want Trump to throw a tantrum when you go there to negotiate something mostly unrelated, so you delay the announcement.