The CCP is special. It’s politicking very much takes it’s people’s happiness (or the people perceived happiness) into account.

Also While they do allow the whole weath inequality gap to increase, they very much control the wealthy, instead of having it the other way around.

Imo, other countries can learn a thing or two. For the CCP dudes, there’s no next election cycle to start ramping up actual work that needs to be done to get them elected again. For them it’s over, if they don’t keep their people happy (content/fooled) and they’re the only goddamn authoritarians that understand that. They understand this, so they keep a tight leash on every enterprise, bank and institution within the country and plan extensively.

That’s what the governments need to do, let only the people’s vote control them and not any money, lobbying, institution or rich person.

The Austrians did elect the FPO back. Did they forget about their incompetency?

I think something more is at play here. Maybe tiktok? Russian interference? Not sure.

I also think it may be because the root problem is not being solved. Late stage capitalism - housing crisis, unemployment and such.

The far right point to immigrants and blames them for it, but the establishment parties also do very little, too late, to solve the issues well either. Then the election cycle comes and people want a reset. A vicious cycle.

I feel like this calls for radical shift in how society operates, doesn’t it (just openly balling)?

I am not saying communist revolution. But I also think we’ve spent too much time kissing rich asses in the name of “we are benefiting from this, keep doing it”. Now that economies don’t grow as fast anymore, the “trickle down” effect isn’t working and people are getting poorer and angrier.

The rich don’t care as long as they can make short term profit, so they keep supporting whoever will help them with that.

There needs to be a change. Or at least the greens, the left need to get some balls, strong leaders and implement some kind of FDResque or clement atleesque policies.

What we need is to give the rich incentives to be happy with what they have and have a stronger government approach to handling things. Avoiding bloodshed is important, don’t want to end up like USSR. Maybe until we figure out unlimited energy we can let the rich be dicks but not let them be too much of dicks.

This was a weird rant…

And billionaires, especially the Nazis variety.

I quite enjoyed Elon getting bullied over POE2 stream.

Most people like trump, because “strong man”. No one really even knows who JD vance or Usha are. But I guess they’d like her, they like rishi sunak. Being rich is seen as a virtue. There’s also a weird obsession with seeing indians in powerful positions, some sort repressed complex.

She’s fine with the racism because “she’s one of the good ones”. She and vance are neoliberalists, opportunists. Watch them try and make as much money as they can before they get kicked out.

You are right, it’s true everywhere. It’s human nature to be wary of people you don’t understand. But, for some things, you’d expect countries that are a lot further ahead in progressivism to be “nicer”, especially since, you know, they industrialised and became richer on the backs of poorer countries.

Though I suppose that’s very difficult to quantitatively measure exactly - how progressive someone is (on the scale of a country). How more accepting they are than other countries.

But there’s also room for letting people air out their issues without being told that “everyone is like this, stop whining”. That’s literally what the Russian goverment does, they implicitly tell their populace that democracy doesn’t work and that this is the best deal they’ll ever get.