Oh you’re definitely not a Jew. Judaism is a religion, not an ethnicity like the Nazis argued. One can drop a religion as you clearly did.

You’re justifying harassing Jews for being Jews.

Think about that.

Nah, we need them to defend Greenland, sorry Donald.

So its ok to require the same from Muslims everytime a terrorist attack happens or everytime a Muslim country sponsors genocide (like the UAE is doing in Sudan)?

What’s the point of having kids in a future full of automation, drones, probably eles freedom and more war?

If China is not global, neither is the US. No one touches each other’s “backyards”. The US had a treaty obligation to defend Ukraine from Russia and never did it (provide some weapons is not the same as actively defending a country).

We should, unfortunately we’ve been alone with that for too long. The world didn’t care when Ukraine was invaded… the international law is dead since then.

Oh I missed the part where Russia’s allies critized their invasion of Ukraine. It’s not, not only there’s a growing rival, China, you have more mid-powers than ever before, from Pakistan and India, to Turkey or even Ethiopia.

It’s not 1945 anymore, for long that the us is not hegemon, its relative power is smaller every year.

But who’s following the rules? Not Russia, not Iran, not Azerbaijan, not Sudan, not Rwanda, not Ethiopia… And the list goes on. This is not new. The question is more, why would the US follow them if no one else does and there’s no consequence?

Gentle reminder that Iran was helping Russia to attack Ukraine and never showed any interest in international law or human rights. Why should we care? I most definitely don’t. Hope their fascist regime crumbles as fast as possible.

Only if you’re not paying attention to the party, they always eagerly fit into the worst clichês of far-left. Always siding with dictators, Islamic terrorists, antissemitic propaganda etc… really much more similar to the RN then they’re supporters like to admit.

Vivaldi is basically Chrome but better, design is better, privacy 1000% better and there’s a couple of extra cool features. But very similar to Chrome, for Chrome users it’s the easiest swap, a true upgrade.

That’s great, I think that like with Mastodon you can always migrate later to another server if you wish… but I never tried that here. Lemmy just needs a bit more and more diverse users, I would say… but it already has all the essentials. Don’t look back to that US big tech and help instead to increase the good content here.

The complete article for people caught by the paywall:

Let’s start with the good news.

Whether you’re reading this on our website or through our app, you’re using technology that we built and manage ourselves. It operates entirely on European servers.

The same is true for some of the tools we rely on to monitor and measure our results, such as Matomo and Metabase.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg; beneath it lies a deep foundation of U.S. technology.

That was once a deliberate decision.

For example, Google Workspace offers an Advanced Protection Programme that combines robust security with ease of use – which made it a rational choice for our newsroom.

Our newsletters (ActiveCampaign), internal communication (Slack), password manager (1Password) and customer support (Intercom) are also owned by U.S. companies or use U.S. servers.

And that’s precisely where the problem lies.

Washington can force U.S. tech companies to share data – even if it’s stored in Europe.

For a newsroom like ours, that possibility undermines our core journalistic principles: protecting sources, maintaining confidentiality, and preserving independence.

In light of recent political developments across the Atlantic, one thing is clear: using U.S. technology leaves us vulnerable.

And unfortunately, this is no longer a remote risk.

Follow our journey For that reason, we’ve decided to phase out U.S. tech and turn to European alternatives.

Yet we know it won’t be easy.

Switching to other software and services will be expensive, require time, and bring its share of frustrations.

At the same time, we think it’s an interesting endeavour from a journalistic perspective, especially as many citizens, companies and governments are wrestling with this very issue.

This is why we’re sharing the process publicly and inviting everyone to follow our journey. We also hope you’ll share your own experiences with us.

We’ll document the alternatives we explore, the decisions we make, the time and money they require, the obstacles we encounter, and the mistakes we make along the way.

Here is an overview of the technology we are currently using.

We’re doing this together with our colleagues at De Correspondent, a leading Dutch outlet.

It’s a natural partnership: we share a journalistic mission, rely on similar technology, and operate at a comparable scale.

Collaborating allows us to work more efficiently, avoid duplicating efforts, and potentially find more cost-effective solutions.

You can sign up for our special newsletter to make sure you never miss an update on this project.

FTM Digital Autonomy We’re phasing out U.S. tech and moving to European alternatives

The newsletter will be sent out periodically, and the next edition will likely arrive once we’ve found someone to lead the project for us.

Today, we are taking the first step in the process.

We’re excited to have you with us.

Share this article, your friends will read it for free

Authors Jan-Willem Sanders Co-owner and Chief Publishing at Follow the Money, and the members’ ambassador.

Harry Lensink co-editor-in-chief. Loves a thrilling story

I’ll post the article on the comments. To be honest I think it was the first time visiting this site, seems very interesting.

I don’t have that issue… read it without issues on mobile Vivaldi browser

Why not leave the comments to the comment section and use the original titles for the posts?

The original title would have been more informative than the one chosen by the op.

It’s not like there’s an abundance of EU focused titles. They often have good and pertinent articles, just judge by article.

Outright banning one of the most influential sites in the EU bubble is just making this corner of the internet even more blind sighted by extreme left orthodoxy instead of being a corner of healthy and interesting debate.