How the hell it is not multiple life sentences?

They gave rheir lives for imperialism and destroying other people countries

And they don’t seem to bothered with zionists talking about no innocent gazan and claiming the whole land belong to israel

Dead on arrival. Such a s tupid concept yo rank contrnt based on tweets

How about a bigger personal collection?

Whatever you think the straight is international water or not, iran as the aggressed has the right to defend itself and impose blockades to do it. That’s why ukaine can legally attack russian linked oil ships. Without the straight, and the drones and missiles that the west always tried to limit, iran wouldf have been already a failed stste like Lybia

There is inly one bad side in a war of aggression, the agressor. The regime oppressiveness is irelevsnt in this context.

I hide both

There is no pure languages anymore. All languages borrow from each other. The tunisian dialect is full of french words

As much as I am agianst russian invadion if ukraine I don’t believe those claims

Your bitch lost gey over it. While you crying about your bitch, other people are fighting Trump

To protect the autocracy. I am pretty sure Iran had good inteligence allowing them to find those scammers andeven execute them

Under Iranian law, serious financial crimes that destabilize the economy are often prosecuted as “corruption on earth,” a capital offense that carries the death penalty

More likely the usa and israel

What if Putin outcompete ukraine in satisfying Trump

Nyziotimes

Sorry, “United States President Donald Trump has said…” isn’t really a reliable source for me

Yes trump is not a reliable source yet you agree with Him and spread his lie. The American intelligence is , it said Iran was not seeking a nuke

But 60% lacks any civilian uses, so the most obvious reason to go to 60% is because it’s between 20% and 90%…

Again yes 60% for civilian has little civilian usage but can be used in negotiation

Now you’re just switching arguments. That doesn’t really address

I did not. Those two arguments shows that Iran was not seeking a nuke but rather was willing to give up enrichment

Anyway, I think I’ve learned all I can from you. Feel free to have the last word.

I learned that you are a zionist scum trying to manufacture consent for the USA and Israel aggression on Iran

US intelligence believe Iran isn’t aiming to build a nuke, but didn’t provide any source to that claim

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/20/trump-says-us-intelligence-wrong-about-iran-not-building-nuclear-bomb

Also, why should we stop at 90%? If tomorrow we’ll find proof Iran has enriched to 90%, you could claim “Well, they just enriched to 90% as a negotiation tool.

No I would not claim that. 90% is weapon grade enrichment, 60% is not

Oh, and your claim is somewhat self-contradictory - If it’s so clear Iran is enriching uranium as a negotiation tactic, doesn’t that make the tactic pointless?

Before the usa started the second aggression on Iran. Iran was willing to agree for zero enrichment proving again the point . Iran only enriching to 60% after Trump teared up the deal and Iran agreeing to zero enrichment . Those two evidence shows that Iran did not seek a nuke but to negotiate. The failure do not prove that it was just an excuse by Iran

And expert in the field can know how long it would take for a technical task to be done so when it says 3 weeks i believe it. Saying 60% of enriched uranium can’t be used as a negociation tool is just speculation . If iran plan was to build a nuke and enrich to 90% american and israeli inteligence would have known about it. If iran wanted a nuke it would have done it , it is very logical since they was at 60% for years before the 12 days war

Zionists would have lost if the strongest economies did not recognize Israel and built relation to it. Again facts is the people who financed the terrorist zionists groups is foreign jewish zionists thst do not represent all jews like isis do not represent all muslims.christian zionists surely has a role but it do not absolve the non christian responsabilities

No it is not misinformation. Hagana, Irgun and lehi was predominantly by from foreign Jewish Zionists . Those Zionists who bombed Arabs, British and jews in a same attack on an Hotel was going to steal the land with or without Belfour . That’s not to say that evangelical Christians do not have influenced in America and support for Israeli terrorism and settler colonialism .

Many secular countries has normal relation with the genocidal settler colonial power for decades too.