“Never trust a tech worker” they said, using a device designed by a tech worker, running software designed by a tech worker, accessing servers maintained by a tech worker, on a hosting service implemented and managed by tech workers, through an internet service provider employing tech workers galore.
Perhaps that is the point: peer auditing instead of blind forwarding
And you didn’t read the article. He wasn’t setting up a booth. He was a featured speaker.
Official US room? You don’t even understand the story. “The US House, Davos” is a location, a venue, where the Fortune Global Leadership Dinner is being held.
I’m not sure how you can look at someone being blocked from speaking to an international audience of world and business leaders - not because nobody is interested, but for political reasons - and not see that as an international issue, regardless of who the involved parties are.
Silencing dissenting voices at an international venue from a notable and experienced politician is an international issue. International access to American political voices, especially those on disagreement with the current leadership, is an important thing for world, and international business leaders to hear, which is exactly what the Fortune Magazine dinner event he was denied entry to is about.
Look at this another way…rather than “American governor wasn’t allowed to speak to international audience”, it is equally “international audience not allowed to hear from American governor”
I was betting on Florida Man as the culprit from just the headline, but the linguistic content made it obvious that this was a deeply Australian man