Turns out it was an NY Times article

No it wasn’t, you’re lying again.

needing someone else to spoon-feed you the exact baby food you want isn’t a great way to go through life

Asking people for sources for their outlandish claims is “being spoonfed baby food” now.

Jesus, you’ll really do anything but just admit to being wrong. It’s so cringe.

Look, you came into this thread trying to dunk on people, got proven wrong, pivoted and doubled down, got proven wrong again and you just can’t seem to handle that fact. We both know it. Just admit it and take the L.

Trust me bro, I was right, I just don’t feel like proving it.

Fragile little ego. So pathetic.

Right, because even though we both know you were wrong, you’re too fragile to admit it.

Still waiting for you to admit you were wrong.

Don’t use services that track all your activity down. It should be pretty obvious as to why.

This doesn’t really apply here.

Come on, it’s not that long. You must have seen how utterly wrong you are by now.

Still waiting on that answer…

Did you read it yet?

Lol the irony…

Of course I know what article you were talking about. Go ahead and read it again and then quote me where it says anything about generating a list of countries that somehow leaves out Russia.

No there isn’t.

Claiming that Trump is constantly kissing Putin’s ass isn’t a conspiracy. It’s not even a secret…

Sure, whatever you need to believe with no evidence to support it

So where’s your evidence that the list of countries was generated by AI?

And you’re back to the “list was generated by AI” conspiracy.

That wasn’t a comprehensive list, just 2 off the jump.

So no, the simpler answer is that sanctions simply aren’t a factor. They didn’t list every country on the planet.

Preventing corporate entities from presenting falsehoods as facts is not a meaningful infringement on free speech.

If it is, then it’s clear that truly free, totally unrestricted in any way speech isn’t a good idea.

Sounds more like we need to more heavily regulate sources of misinformation, rather than deeming some people too stupid to participate in the system.

I feel like it’s a very Fox News-y suggestion to ban select groups of people from voting.

There’s also a much stronger possibility that Trump simply didn’t want to piss off Putin.

Why are you trying to find a more complicated answer?

Or, much more simply, Trump didn’t want to make Putin mad.

Let them deal in baseless conspiracy

so it’s probably too complicated for ChatGPT

FFS people, sanctioned countries were not included

Iran and Syria were included.