Just keep regenerating data until it’s something the stock holders like. Doesn’t matter if it’s BS. They’re already accustomed to that.

They already can by putting your finger on the camera and lighting up your finger with the led light. Then it detects the rhythmic changes picked up by the camera… At least 10+ years ago. It was a good novelty feature, but turns out, for most healthy people, checking your heart rate gets old after a few runs.

… I think we read different articles.

Even in the article:

According to a 2023 study, a day on Earth was approximately 19 hours for a significant part of Earth’s early history…

No publisher is going to pay a professional to narrate their audiobooks when they can have AI do a shitty job for much less.

A shitty narrator can get me to hate a book I like. A great narrator can bring the characters to life, enhance the experience, and turn me from a listener to a fan. I’ve searched for books by narrators like Nick Podehl and Jeff Hayes and bought audiobooks I wouldn’t have otherwise.

I wouldn’t support it even if the author couldn’t afford it otherwise. There’s no test to confirm that and knowing profit margines, all publishers will use AI for all their books.

Yes, I’d want smaller authors to have people listen to their books, but without oversight, it’s going to ruin all audiobooks.

Can NYT or someone sue for libel? That’s defamation with false information. I’m not looking for a fine, but an order requiring them to say they were wrong and published false information. Then NYT can publish that tweet in their headline.

*Hugs self*

I would stop following the tarrif news if it wasn’t the headline on everything. Is anything else going on while he’s doing this? Did he overthrow the judicial system or something?

Well yeah, they get their information from the Internet. Garbage in. Garbage out.

Mazda’s Laputa translates to “the bitch” in Spanish.

There’s also Ford’s Probe…

But yeah ID.EVERY1 is a mediocre name.