wholookshere

That’s missing the point of maybe we don’t need to travel indiscriminately?

You say that like the greatest terrorist organisation isnt the US military.

What I’m pushing agaisnt is who your letting define twrrosit, because to most west asia (and even east Asia), the terorista are the US military.

Look at what you made me do

So you are saying the us shouldn’t have launched the campaign? Because that sounds exactly like how your responding as well. They’re all terrorists, look at what you made me do…

What about the american terrorism? Glossing over that?

What I’m pointing out here,

Is that Americans and Israels have been the terrorist for decades in that region. Assisinating generals they feel like, bombing schools, developing nukes, the list goes on so much more than Iran and its proxies. So o don’t understand how you can primailry denounce the little guy, at the expense of the angry shark in the room.

Because there likely wouldn’t be as much terrorism, if not for the decades of antagonist behaviours.

I can be mad at both, and still believe Iran is in the right to defend itself from American and Israeli imperialism first.

As have yours by the way.

Your right, there’s tons of historical context here.

You act like this attitude twords the US and its allies are in a vacuum.

You act like Israel doesn’t have nukes treating them as well, funding terror in the region themselves. Gaza and Lebanon come to mind.

Why should Iran cozy up to such a hostile nation?

They’re not. There rooted in the blood spilled by those same countries.

If the US is hated, it’s probably justified.

What facts did I make-up? Do Jews not live in Iran?

what else happened about then…

Did you ever stop to think why they say that?

Counldnt have anything to do with the way Isriel has treated muslim neighbours could it now.

Probably similar to the thousands of Jews that live peacefully in Iran?

And chevron deference is dead.

So its up to judges to determine what the rules are.

Say what you will about the clown courts the US has. But then don’t claim that HIPAA matters at all then. Because its only worth the paper it’s on sure. But then the entire conversation is moot.

There’s no legal definition of “yet to be defined” rules. That’s not how the US legal system works. You cant define rules after the fact and call someone guilt/in violation of rules that don’t exist.

Violation of what specifically?

Because HIPAA does not say you cant store data with third parties. That would be every cloud EMR out there.

That’s my point though. Is HIPAA says nothing technical about who can store data, just who’s responsible for it getting out.

I’m also required to be compliant.

But how can companies like google have products like

https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa

if cloud storage is a violation?

I’m not op, and I’ve Read the actual law.

Fun fact, the law actually does not lay out a single technical “must do”.

But rather establish liabilities and defines miss use. Which is NOT the same as proper use.

Yes, but you talked about how cloud storage vs on prem is a violation.

Put up or shut up.

Also see my edit about a BAA

Legally, any organization that used this service would be opening themselves to further liability under HIPAA.

What legal violation? Because the law says nothing about that.

what the law does allow, is data storage with a BAA.

can you site the part of HIPAA that says that?

There’s no certification for HIPAA defined in law.