• talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s also worth clarifying that ProtonMail doesn’t collect IP addresses by default. Instead, the monitoring/ logging starts after ProtonMail gets a legal request.

    They still have to adhere to legal requests.

      • talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Under Swiss law, ProtonMail should notify the user if a third party makes a request for their private data and if the data is for a criminal proceeding. However, there’s a big catch/ loophole here. On its law enforcement page, ProtonMail highlights that the notification can be delayed in the following cases:

        Where providing notice is temporarily prohibited by the Swiss legal process itself, by Swiss court order, or applicable Swiss law;

        Where, based on information supplied by law enforcement, we, in our absolute discretion, believe that providing notice could create a risk of injury, death, or irreparable damage to an identifiable individual or group of individuals;

        As a general rule though, targeted users will eventually be informed and afforded the opportunity to object to the data request, either by ProtonMail or by Swiss authorities.

        This incident seems to fall under the first case, and that’s why ProtonMail didn’t notify the user. “Some orders are final and cannot be appealed, that’s just how the legal system works, not everything can be appealed. The user wasn’t notified for the same reason that you don’t notify a suspect before arresting them,” says ProtonMail founder Andy Yen.

    • Nyxias@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, exactly.

      Privacy is and should be a right, absolutely if you’ve done nothing wrong.

      But it doesn’t absolve anyone from the right to shroud from any crime committed, period.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        should be a right, absolutely if you’ve done nothing wrong.

        The loss of privacy happens before the determination whether that person has done anything wrong. If the person’s criminal case goes well, do you have a time machine to go back and not invade privacy?

        • Nyxias@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, because that’s the part where someone should’ve learned a lesson or two. What do you mean if a criminal case goes well? If someone is suspected of something and may be involved in a crime, what entitlement do you have? It is part of a criminal investigation process. You either comply or worsen your odds by raising suspicions if you continually refuse to cooperate because you’re too busy debating police officers about “MUH PRIVACY”. Duuuuuhhhhhhh!

          Did you think you stepped on some checkmate kind of discovery here? No, you didn’t.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The police gained access to the IP address because Swiss authorities chose to cooperate with the French government

    We’ve seen this several times now. Proton is subject to Swiss law, just like every company in their respective countries. You choose Proton because Switzerland has the most privacy protections of any country on the planet (for now).

    If you want private communications, don’t use email. In fact, if we could all stop using email entirely, that’d be wonderful. There are hundreds of truly-private alternatives, many with no company involved at all.

    • holomorphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is absolute nonsense. I would prefer most of Europe over Switzerland. The swiss government was always bad with privacy. See Fichenaffäre for example. Not to mention the new büpf and similar laws. I’m swiss. I would never store sensitive data in Switzerland on a public server. Well. Except taxdata, I guess. Can’t really get around that.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    The lesson here is despite what a service says, don’t trust it and take the appropriate measures to cover your tracks.

    You can create an access the inbox through Tor at protonmailrmez3lotccipshtkleegetolb73fuirgj7r4o4vfu7ozyd.onion

    The important thing is to always access it through Tor.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also pay attention to what the service says and what it doesn’t. We get into this spot regularly because of things people assumed about Protonmail without being told.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why is this a surprise? IP Logging is pretty normal for any service.

    2.5 IP logging: by default, we do not keep permanent IP logs in relation with your Account. However, IP logs may be kept temporarily to combat abuse and fraud, and your IP address may be retained permanently if you are engaged in activities that breach our Terms of Service (e.g. spamming, DDoS attacks against our infrastructure, brute force attacks). The legal basis of this processing is our legitimate interest to protect our service against non-compliant or fraudulent activities. If you enable authentication logging for your Account or voluntarily participate in Proton’s advanced security program, the record of your login IP addresses is kept for as long as the feature is enabled. This feature is off by default, and all the records are deleted upon deactivation of the feature. The legal basis of this processing is consent, and you are free to opt in or opt out of that processing at any time in the security panel of your Account. The authentication logs feature records login attempts to your Account and does not track product-specific activity, such as VPN activity.

    Source: Their privacy policy.

  • ShotDonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Apart from it’s an old story, discussed already back and forth, Proton’s claims regarding privacy are really weak. Especially when it comes to presenting Switzerlamd as a privacy safehaven. Switzerland is a tax evasion savehaven, not a privacy safehaven, Proton. How Proton puts it: we provide world class privacy (but have to break our claims and comply with Swiss law immediately once there is a legitimate or not request from law enforcement, oepsie sorreyy!)

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Proton needs to get its head out of its ass and fire Andy already, grow a pair and get off Reddit and back onto Mastodon and face the backlash like actual adults.

  • Nyxias@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay so I do remember this issue being brought up a long time ago so it’s not exactly news and the author has a poor time lapse of events.

    ProtonMail is not like a safe haven for any criminal operation, that would make Proton incredibly liable. Just like Telegram became with what’s been happening with trafficking and children-related incidents.

    Secondly, an IP address is like stupidly easy to get anyways on someone unless VPN.

    There is just so many things wrong that people are not taking into account but I guess let others go on self-virtuous parades to demonize Proton. If you understand laws, this is not a problem. If you understand tech, you’d realize the same. If you understand both, then hooray! You get it.

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So Protonmail was required to log the IP of the user after being ordered to via the proper international Swiss legal channeks, per Swiss/Europol law. And at some point recently, Protonmail thus removed the copy from their frontpage that advertised never tracking IPs.

    What the article doesn’t really explain, is what exactly changed about Swiss or euro law? And when? What rules or acts have sprung up that made this possible? Or, was this always something that was possible that has only just now made precedent?

    It’s important to hold accountable the named individuals who are harming individual security, safety, and trust in this manner so that they can be prevented from continuing to do so.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh ffs. We have known for years that Proton is just a for profit company like any other. They dont give a fuck about you or your privacy. They never have and they never will.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I never said anything about complying with laws, people just interpreted it that way. Of course everyone will comply with local laws or secret government orders that come with threats of imprisonment. I dont know if Proton was required to log this data in the first place, but if they were then this specific situations is not their fault.

        The issue with Proton isnt that they follow laws, but that they portray themselves like they are better or more private than others when they are just not. Bigger = worse in the tech world. Whenever too many people are using services of a single company, it becomes an attractive surveillance target.

        What im also annoyed about is people being surprised by this and these headlines that make it look like its some sort of betrayal. You should always be worried about your privacy when you put data on a computer that isnt in your physical possession. Proton isnt trustworthy because nobody is trustworthy except yourself.

  • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    “climate activists have been taking over commercial apartments” So … trespassing? They breached privacy for apparent trespassing? Is that it?

      • Pechente@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        A few months ago the CEO tweeted that he supported Trump and his policies. The most ironic part was that he’s an immigrant himself but lives in Switzerland.

        Not sure if anything else happened since.

        • Venia Silente@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not sure if anything else happened since

          Well, immediately since, the board supported the CEO’s support for Trump; but I don’t recall anything of note since then.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I dont really blame Proton for this. Accessing anything on the internet on a clear connection and not through a VPN or TOR makes it your own damn fault when you get identified.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean, I understand where you’re coming from, they absolutely shouldn’t log IPs. BUT, if you’re committing crimes or even doing legal things the government doesn’t like, it would behoove you to put in the absolute bare minimum of OPSEC at least.

        Like, some people know they have STDs and don’t warn people and spread them, right? And while the spreader is obviously the problem there, some commonly accepted advice to the victim is “you should have worn a condom anyway.” And they should have worn a condom to protect themselves (and also the spreader should be held liable.)

        Like the previous example, anyone using any online service (for secrety things) should know to put a VPN condom on before they put their data inside that sexy, slutty server rack. And like how contraceptives were that knowledge needs to be spread.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Those who used it imagined Swiss law to be less intrusive? I suppose it sounds like a good idea to anyone, which is mostly everyone, who doesn’t know Swiss law.

    Yeah, they rolled over to the authority, as expected. But, they sold themselves as “private”, not “private up to the extent of Swiss law, and our laws here are very intrusive, so really the private part isn’t going to get anyone very far if they use this service for anything slightly questionable, let alone outright illegal. You might as well be using GMail for how ‘private’ this thing is.”

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      they sold themselves as “private”, not "private up to the extent of Swiss law

      No, they sold themselves as “private up to the extent of Swiss law”.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Journalists, activists and even lawyers on the side of activists should always use something like Tails. No matter what companies like Proton promise or what the law in the country they operate in says.

    https://tails.net/

  • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    WHAAAAATTT???

    The same company that supports Trump and closed the account of two journalists???

    Who would’ve EVER EVER EVER expected that???

    I AM IN SHOCK!!!

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Stop spreading misinformation.

      You can look it up for yourself but the tldr is that the company donates to leftist organizations that promote freedom, privacy, and open source.

      They temporarily suspended 2 journalist accounts in order to verify if they were nation state hackers which was flagged by a CERT, which they reinstated.