• M.int@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not sorry that I pointed out that that guy is a transphobe, but I am sorry that I engaged with you again.

      I’m going to block you now. Originally I wanted to discuss Imane Khelif, when new concrete information was available, but now I am going to block you for my own sake. @davidagain@lemmy.world can discuss with you until both of your keyboards break.

      • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It doesn’t matter what you think of him personally. He’s still an expert in his field, correctly pointing out the scientific consensus. Again, if you don’t like him, take your pick of other experts that signed the Project Nettie statement that affirms the same truth with the credentials of your choice.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hehe. Powerstruggle is one of the most persistent transphobic conversation derailers on lemmy. They show up in any post related to trans people to discuss their pet transphobic theories, often one which Trump gave. Imagine being intellectuality dominated by Donald Trump!

        I completely understand you blocking them. If I were the mod of a news sub where they repeatedly behaved the way they do, I would wield the ban hammer hard.

          • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            29 days ago

            The user you’re agreeing with isn’t right in the head. You should take that as a sign to introspect and examine why you’re also wrong. They’re also fixated on Trump for some reason. I unfortunately had to respond several times to the same misinformation being spammed by the same user. It would be easier for everyone if they hadn’t done that in the first place.

            • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              You’re all over spamming transphobic bullshit. You’re here in bad faith to push a culture war agenda because you’re a fucking bigot. Fuck off. Nothing you’ve posted here has been at all relevant, you’re a bigot posting junk science to push gender essentialism. You’re a bigot. You’re a transphobic bigot piece of shit now go fuck yourself.

        • powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2025/04/03/colin-wright-gives-a-history-of-the-gametic-definition-of-biological-sex/

          The historical and scientific record is clear: from the 19th century to the present day, biologists, medical professionals, philosophers of science, and evolutionary theorists have used gamete type as the defining criterion for sex. This document compiles citations from that record, providing a reference point for students, scientists, educators, and anyone interested in understanding what “male” and “female” mean in biological terms.

          These citations span more than a century of scientific literature, showing that the gamete-based definition of sex is not a recent invention or a reactionary response, but a longstanding, fundamental biological principle. While sex roles and secondary sex characteristics can vary, the definition of the sexes does not: male and female are reproductive categories rooted in the type of gamete an individual has the function to produce.

          Stop lying