

LAD Bible is the modern day equivalent of the Weekly World News. They are not a credible source.
LAD Bible is the modern day equivalent of the Weekly World News. They are not a credible source.
Great, a device style I hate with a screen style I hate. I look forward to never owning one.
Philadelphia Experiment anyone?
Should be super easy to prove too… Take an assortment of Teslas to a 1 mile stretch of road, drive it up and down 20 times, measure the mileage before and after.
Should be super easy to prove too… Take an assortment of Teslas to a 1 mile stretch of road, drive it up and down 20 times, measure the mileage before and after.
Self posts are not allowed.
Change.org petition with 34 signatures does not rise to the level of a news article.
When a news organization covers the story, feel free to post that link.
And still have data caps…
Reported as an opinion article, which it is, but if you read rule 3 it’s that “Opinion articles MAY be removed”, not “WILL be removed”.
Reading it over, I don’t see anything super objectionable here. If the opinion were factually wrong we’d remove it for that, not purely because it’s opinion.
Video links are not allowed.
They say the voltage is less than a AA battery at 0.9v, but how much volume is needed to hit that? Can’t you exceed that by, you know, just adding more volume?
Video links aren’t allowed, please find a corresponding article.
Operating Systems EVERYTHING.
FTFY!
That makes sense! Thanks!
They only highlight 9, I thought 15 were killed? 🤔
This is why I don’t just knee jerk remove mismatches when it’s clear it’s not bad faith.
And, yeah, when I posted up the live update on the Myanmar earthquake, I was checking it hourly. Mostly for updates on the story, but also changes.
Yeah, I generally give 8-12 hours on removal unless it’s obvious editorializing.
Pro-Tip, and I’ve been burned on this too…
Whenever you link to a “Live Update!” story, they are GOING to change the headline on you. Sometimes multiple times.
Not your fault, but it runs you afoul of rule 1, headline must match article.
“Live updates on the global markets: China raises retaliatory tariff on the US to 84%”
I’m not going to just knee jerk remove it because it’s clear you aren’t editorializing, but please fix it soon so we don’t have to remove it.
Waaaaay longer than that…
The surprise would be if they WEREN’T supplying weapons.