If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, abortion clinics would be so standard they’d be on every corner, like McDonald’s. In fact, it’d be a sign of status to go to one.

Male 1: “I’m just off to the abortion clinic real quick.”

Male 2: “Oh nice, King. You’ve been busy.”

Male 1 leaves.

Male 3: “He’s so cool.”

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, there wouldn’t be.

    The policy would be the same, because the issue of abortion makes the two ruling parties way too much money to make it worth legalizing or banning completely. Hell, when the leak of the Roe repeal occurred, Democrats raked in $80,000,000 alone. A cool $80,000,000 and all they had to do was pretend to care about abortion by making a tweet or something.

    OP is incorrect.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Clearly, we have to genetically modify all men to be hyenas, so that they can experience the Miracle of Life through their dicks. /S.

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    ok so i might be wrong here, but abortions can be safely and reliably carried out with pills, right?

    and it’s very difficult to actually check every package and letter that is sent whether it contains illegal pills. at least that’s my guess. so would it be possible to buy abortion pills from the netherlands, the same way that one can buy drugs?

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Correct, but depending on legislation the punishment might be so high that the risk is not worth it for many people.

  • binux@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This would be such an extreme warping of reality that it’s essentially impossible to make any assumptions about what it would entail like this. You know the joke about a time traveller moving a rock? Yeah, that times a million.

  • daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You never see legislation on condoms.

    Just birth control.

    When it’s a man’s choice it’s uncontested.

    But a woman shouldn’t have the same autonomy.

    • nforminvasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not here but in Africa the Catholic Church pushed for total bans on birth control, condoms included, official in some places and socially in others. The result was huge spikes in HIV across swaths of Africa.

      Also don’t be surprised if there is eventually a ban on all both control, not because of actual theocratic desire, but because billionaires don’t want us to have any. Deep down they know LLMs will not lead to AI powerful enough to replace all workers, like they were hoping for a few years back, so they know they need human slaves. They use evangelical idiocy to spur up theocratic chuds and convince the masses, they’re one of them. But these assholes have no set ethics or morals, good or bad, just greed and powerlust.

      I bet they are planning all sorts of ways to force us to have future slaves for them. Not saying it will work, I think population decline is unavoidable and not that bad tbh, but they will absolutely try.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know project 2025 has plans for forcing teenage girls to have pregnancy.

        Which is illogical even by their standards as babies more likely to be still born and premature from teenage mothers. And pregnant teen girls more likely to have complications resulting in death and permanent sterility.

        We gotta get rid of these insane psychopaths before they destroy the planet and everything on it.

    • tiny_hedgehog@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That wasn’t my point. My point was that the world is run by men. Policymakers and politicians are, in general, men. And since abortion is about giving women freedom over their bodies and life decisions, (most) men don’t allow that. Therefore there’s a very unfair disconnect. My point was that if men were the target of anti-abortion policies, then such policies would by and large not exist.

      ETA: As another commenter pointed out, perhaps statistically most men are pro-choice, but unfortunately in general the backwards few who go into and succeed in politics are the ones who make the call.

    • BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I went to a pro-choice march in my city and made a sign that said

      “If men could get pregnant
      You’d get abortions
      With your oil change”

      And I feel like that makes about the same point. Men wouldn’t tolerate carrying an unwanted pregnancy if men had to deal with pregnancy.

    • tiny_hedgehog@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s a good quote. Maybe it was rolling around somewhere in my subconscious.

      ETA: or maybe I am the cab driver mentioned in the article.

  • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Did you know grey hyenas have a matriarchal society? Females are more aggressive, dominant and hold different social status to males. They aren’t less horrible than patriarchal hyenas.

    The problem isn’t the males or the females. It’s that they’re hyenas.

    • tiny_hedgehog@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t see hyenas oppressing one another through systems of well orchestrated indoctrination. They may just nibble each other once in a while.

      • Count042@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        If men gave birth, then nothing else would be the same.

        The systems of oppression that exist were created for a reason. Evil reasons, but reasons none the less. It’s not random.

        There is a reason hunter/gatherer societies tend to be more egalitarian, and agricultural societies tend to be less egalitarian, and it isn’t because farming turns people evil and misogynistic.

        Furthermore, abortion was largely accepted until increased birthrates were required for the needs of empire. Despite the arguments being religious in nature against abortion, the original drivers for outlawing it were non-religous.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re way behind. That’s why laws approved are no longer named after what they really do. Who decides that a specific law harms a specific population? The same people approving them… So… Yeah.

      • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        What? No. Laws are never named after what they do, they’re named HR#### or something. Acts are nicknamed, like Obamacare or the PATRIOT act, but they’ve always been political and not descriptive.

        And the people who write the laws are not the same people who “approve” them, in theory.

    • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And they give birth through a pseudo penis that is torn apart.

      I don’t think it brings anything useful to the conversation, but it is an interesting fact.