• Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    NBC’s AI can’t write worth a hoot:

    Hundreds of works were damaged at the Louvre in Paris when a pipe burst because of flooding, the museum’s deputy general administrator said.

    The flooding led to a burst pipe and affected one of the three rooms of the library in the Egyptian antiquities department, he said.

    Above are paragraphs 1 and 3 from the referenced article.

    A simple but logical reading of both states that “a flood occurred (first), and the flood is what caused the pipe to burst (second)”. Extremely disappointed in this level of journalistic competence.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I don’t think it’s AI. It looks like bad human writing. An AI wouldn’t use clunky non-idiomatic phrases like this:

      He noted that the area of the pipe break is part of museum spaces that will undergo a major renovation…

      Also, A LLM would be unlikely to say a flood led to a burst pipe when it has lots of examples of writing where the causation is the other way round. A human having a brain fart might make that mistake though.

      I suspect this article was written in a hurry by someone whose English isn’t great.

      • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Good gravy! I was giving NBC at least a little credit for trying to do mediocre journalism.

        I know English is not everyone’s first (or even second) language, but if your job is writing for a living in English at least get some help.

        P.S. I only know one language myself and couldn’t read/write/speak/understand any other to save my soul, so I think people that can are really gifted. It’s just that NBC obviously didn’t care about this article in the least.