• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “We should respond to this with pure cold rage.”

    No. You’re adults and leaders. You can be angry but your response should be rational, not emotional.

    • Cypher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The rational solution is to execute the murderer, jail the family for a long time for obstruction of justice and when their sentences are up deport them.

      The police who cuffed a dying man should be jailed for negligent manslaughter.

        • Cypher@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          His guilt is beyond any doubt and a bullet is cheap.

          There is zero reason to house and feed him.

          He should be executed and his rotten family should pick up the bill.

            • Cypher@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You think the death penalty is edgy? It has been used for thousands of years across numerous societies.

                • Cypher@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  It solves the need to feed, house, and guard murderous scum.

                  In cases where there is zero doubt a person is a murderer it should be used.

                  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    It does reduce the amount of people to feed and house, but the right to life and the right to be innocent before proven guilty both hold. Cops being the judge, jury and executioner is inherently unreliable, and human beings inherently have biases based on thousands of factors, so there WILL be officers stating “oh nah they attacked me” without the attack actually happening and their life being taken just because the officer has a racist or biased interpretation of their behaviour.

                    Also, seeming that you’re from aussie.zone, it appears you are of course an Aussie like me, so you should have already caught that we are multicultural, and we are going through a tough time of the public discriminating against itself. Extrajudicial killings by law enforcement will amplify this.

                  • qarbone@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    There have been numerous cases where racists have had “zero doubt” that a black person has done a crime.

                    You keep making the wording on that “zero doubt murder” bill more air-tight, and I’ll tell you when it’s acceptable, Sisyphus.