Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reaffimed his firm refusal to cede any territory, resisting U.S. pressure for a painful compromise with Russia as he continued to rally European support for Ukraine.

“Undoubtedly, Russia insists for us to give up territories. We, clearly, don’t want to give up anything. That’s what we are fighting for,” Zelenskyy said in a WhatsApp chat late Monday in which he answered reporters’ questions.

“Do we consider ceding any territories? According to the law we don’t have such right. According to Ukraine’s law, our constitution, international law, and to be frank, we don’t have a moral right either.”

  • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fair bit of speculation on Russia’s behalf.

    The most important point to keep in mine is that most of the world (ie countries outside of NATO) do not see NATO as a defensive alliance.

    We can argue back and forth about whether Russia was justified to start a war over perceived expansion (I don’t believe so) but historical context is important and I don’t think it’s hard to see how they perceived a threat from their geopolitical perspective, especially if even Merkel recognized that.

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      We can argue back and forth about whether Russia was justified to start a war over perceived expansion

      Well, not really. Russia was not justified in the full-scale unprovoked invasion of a sovereign country.

      Putin pretends there’s a threat to expand Russia territory/influence. Russia isn’t existentially threatened, they want to control neighboring regions.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s fair, what was meant was whether Russia could feel justified in doing so (from their perspective) in a similar way that America felt justified in its war on Iraq or its posturing for war in Venezuela. All of which are not justified from an objective perspective.

      • shawn1122@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        NATO has not started a war but that is not mutually exclusive from it being perceived as an arm of American imperialism. The general perception is that due to its astronomical defense spending the US has disproportionate influence within the group. There is precedent for NATO countries joining America in unjustified wars. This contributes to the perception that, if the US conjures up a reason to go to war with your country, there is a whole club of countries which America may have coercive leverage over (due to defense investment) that may join in seeking to anhilate you.

        NATO countries are (or perhaps were) America’s sphere of influence.