• username_1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Scared? They just tune the balance because they see that the currect level of investments won’t provide a nice ratio of profits. Scared… Scared of who?

        • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also the ML you’re talking about is being treated like the red-headed stepchild, despite being the only type that has yielded real benefits. The vast majority of this investment appears to be in LLM systems and facilities to run them.

            • badgermurphy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              You’re right that it is fairly opaque. I am largely speaking from what I understand to be the sentiment of the AI companies themselves. All of the media and material put out is is in advancement of and advertising for agentic tools, which are LLM-based. I find that the other ML tools take such a distant backseat that most people don’t know what I’m even talking about when discussing non-LLMs.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I love how all their proposed solutions are similarly disconnected from reality. Like “Let’s just give the poors a big break on income taxes”. Income taxes on lower-income families are already low, plus if nobody has a job in the AI dystopia then what do income taxes matter?

    • recursivepickle@piefed.dk
      link
      fedilink
      dansk
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Let’s make some consolations through the government, so they can pay for these things, with the money that we are avoiding paying in corporate taxes.”

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s also another option that none of them seem to be pushing: if AI is as disruptive as they say, there’s always the option to pull the plug. That they won’t even consider this choice suggests that their appeals to the toiling masses aren’t in good faith — which at this point should be obvious to just about everyone.

    There’s still this other question: Who will it be who pulls these plugs?