Please don’t expect the community to give you answers to your questions which you then delete right afterwards. Those of us who put time into answering your questions are not doing so just to serve your personal needs, we are here to help build a community knowledge base that others can search and reference.

This has become a chronic issue with Lemmy and its starting to feel like it’s a waste of time to answer questions.

  • Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I imagine this is a controversial opinion…but isn’t the idiomatic solution to this to either:

    petition the mods to get this rule added and enforced

    or

    To start a community that enforces this rule and let it compete with this one.

    Isn’t that the whole idea of federation?

    • James R Kirk@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It absolutely is. Another benefit of federation is that it means we can report OP to our own instances to free their feeds of what I call “whining slop”.

    • irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      petition the mods to get this rule added and enforced

      I’m keen to know how that would be written much less enforced. # deletes and you’re out? That’s a lot to keep up with unless there were some automated way of doing that.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        I wasnt suggesting it would be easy, in fact i think it would be rather difficult on both fronts.

        My comment was more about the method by which this kind of this was intended to be addressed.

  • NostraDavid@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Just go ask an LLM first (ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/Mistral/yourselfhostedllm). If it doesn’t know, then come ask here.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      There are a couple of accounts who were doing this regularly for some reason on all sorts of different topics. But I would need to see more evidence of this happening. As someone else mentioned it could be mods or a couple rare cases or all sorts of things.

      • zuana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Lately in all of the lemmys like each time I go to look at my replies (if I ever get one), the reply, my comment, and the thread are all gone. I’m often thinking it’s mods just nuking threads because of inflammation or whatever.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Weird, I see that pretty rarely and is usually because the post broke some rule (offtopic, duplicate, etc)

          • zuana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            Maybe I’m just attracted to rule breaker threads. <3

            Not so much in this Lemmy, other ones really.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I wonder if someone is trying out an AI or something and seeing the results. Then deleting. More evidence will pop up eventually.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          My guess was that it’s users who fundamentally misunderstand federation, and think that deleting their comments will prevent them from being scraped or used to ID them later. In reality, if someone was truly concerned about avoiding doxxing, they’d just switch accounts. Because anyone can spin up a single-user instance, federate to scrape content from all the communities they want, and then simply refuse to respect delete requests.

          Because when you delete something on a Lemmy instance, the instance simply sends a delete request to all the other instances that federated with it. But those other instances can easily ignore the delete request and retain the deleted content for as long as they want.

          That’s also part of why it’s so stupid that AI crawlers are scraping Lemmy and thrashing instance owners’ rate limits. The AI crawler could just set up a new instance and automatically gather the content via federation. But instead, they just send crawler bots. Because fuck the instance owners, I got my content either way and using a crawler bot didn’t require me to learn how federation works.

          • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Huh. That’s a smart idea (AI federated instance). I imagine Lemmy is too small for it to be on Big AIs radar very much (just yet)

          • xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            23 days ago

            My guess was that it’s users who fundamentally misunderstand federation, and think that deleting their comments will prevent them from being scraped or used to ID them later.

            I really don’t understand these people. If you don’t want to be doxxed or scraped, stop participating online. It’s that simple. Even if you participate in a private sub, it will eventually get scrapped.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yes! This drives me crazy. I will sometimes go back and edit posts to add more info months later.

    We have all been in a situation where we are looking for a very specific answer, and the answer only exists in one obscure forum from a decade ago that has the exact info we are looking for.

    It’s hard enough to ensure lemmy’s long-term fidelity without people axing their own content.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      The post yes, the comments no. You can’t view the post any more. Here’s one that was removed by the mod, but the effect is the same: https://lemmy.zip/post/65524914

      Comments on a post still exist in that user’s history, and you can see those, but you can’t see them in context.

  • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Who’s downvoting this?? Ban those moronic leeches. They’re either anti-community or have the reading comprehension of a potato, ffs.

    • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I suspect people who realized it was the former moderator removing the posts, and not the users themselves.

      We don’t need to be unpleasant to disagreethough, so going forward lets try to avoid that.

      • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Eh… IMO there’s a big difference between disagreeing about something reasonable, and disagreeing about the most basic tenets of what makes a community a community.

        Kinda’ just making room for the sort of hypocritical ilk that ruin so many things. I can think of so many political and religious examples these days but I’ll refrain from fully describing such depressing things.

        • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          I’d re-read what I said then - again, it was not users deleting their content, but the former moderator. People downvoting were likely responding to the blame being placed on the users - aka, the members of this community - when they were not to blame. The people you just referred to as moronic leeches with the reading comprehension of a potato who were, again, not to blame.

          • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Who is downvoting a post based on what’s not in the post title or body? Besides, there are far more downvotes now than when I made my original comment, so it’s clearly not people being fooled by previous, now removed comments.

            Also, I said or. It’s Either they’re against a community of answering questions openly, or have the reading comprehension of a potato…

            • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Whats in the post title is blaming users. Its incorrect.

              I’d recommend you reconsider who needs to work on their reading comprehension, as well as the attitude coming in here. This is a community, and one where we don’t need to come in and attack/name call, especially when you’ve fundamentally misunderstood the issue.

              • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                lol I’ve understood the issue. The original post is not exactly nuanced. I’m sorry you feel so offended by my opinion that people who do not understand what a community of questions and answers should look like should not be welcome to people who understand what publicly answered questions should look like, but you do you.

  • SecretSauces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    I’ve made a couple of posts here and there to get some answers on how to do certain things, as I’m really new to this whole self-hosting thing. But after some time my thread gets auto-deleted, often before I can even get a solid answer to my question.

    So, if /c/SelfHosted isn’t where I should post beginner questions for the community to help me, where should I post? The sidebar provides no link to something like that.

  • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    I have mixed feelings on post deletion. On the one hand, historical technical forum conversations are an incredibly valuable resource, and /c/selfhosted is a technical community. The value comes from having a history in context, and deleting part of the context damages the whole and makes the whole corpus less useful overall. It also allows incorrect or outdated information to fester when there isn’t a strong historical context that can be referenced.

    On the other hand, people are right to be concerned about leaving large tracts of text available on the open internet, where it can be scraped, profiled, and possibly de-anonymized. I am very sympathetic to those who delete out of concerns for their own privacy, and I don’t know what a good solution is.

    Maybe a compromise would be (on user “delete”) to leave the contents of a post intact, but simply delete the username from the post, and the post from the user’s history? Deletion on the fediverse is a bit of a sham anyway, and it would leave valuable discussions intact for other users.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I think a good solution would be to create a community specifically to connect people who don’t want to share their posts with people willing to provide individual help. They could find each other and DM a conversation. Milking a public forum for advice and then vandalizing it by deleting the post is definitely NOT a good solution, and I do not share your sympathy for people who do that. It’s like curtaining off a few back rows of a bus to use all day as an office - although that could have been funny in a Seinfeld episode.

      • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        There are good reasons for hiding a paper trail. Specifically in a self-hosting community, I understand operators wanting to hide their particular technical details from those who would wish to target them. This can be government agencies who like to arrest or kill dissidents, or freelance assholes who just like to attack queer infra where they can. I don’t think deleting posts is particularly effective, and the privacy concerns would be better addressed with a safe alt or a burner account, but I get why some people do it. Privacy is hard and when the stakes are high, people tend to over-secure rather than risk under-securing.

        • xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          It’s always standard OPSEC to anonymize/obfuscate your infra details.

          If they are really concerned about privacy, host a local LLM and query it. You’ll get a subservient AI which doesn’t argue with you about data permanence, and all your data stays inhouse. Stop participating in public forums.

    • Deebster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      If people want to ask something that they don’t want tied to them, they should use a throwaway account. Scrapers will probably grab the text quickly (especially if they’re using ActivityPub) so it’s a false sense of security to do it days later.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      If you post something to a federated platform, it is literally never deleted. There is no privacy to be gained from deleting posts from the fediverse.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I don’t get it why would selfhosting-related hardware questions be irrelevant? If we are talking about 14tb drives having weird behaviour, I’d say this is the right place to ask.

        • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Wow crazy I couldn’t imagine that this community gets enough posts to warrant so aggressively enforcing rules about the content.

          • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Exactly, I could understand it on the huge subreddits with one question per minute, but here is so silent…

            Plus, as a user, when a mod deletes a post that I took over ten minutes to write, I go “fuck It” and stop contributing altogether (this also includes replying to other posts)

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.worksM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Some people think that keeping a community laser focused attracts more readers through quality. It’s an ideal that I respect, but I’ve never really observed that to be true in reality.

            If you’re reading this @HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz consider this my polite feedback that I completely get what you’re trying to accomplish but you might be working harder than you need to be.

            • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 days ago

              @HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world Just to add, I would say working to the detriment of the community through the deletions.

              Locking would make more sense, along with redirecting to specific communities that you feel would be more relevant.

              As I see it, I think people post here for what could be considered tangential because it is more popular than similar communities. I think this very post shows that the users have been perfectly fine with the posts being made, and are bothered by the information (effectively) disappearing with deletions.

              If the mod team does not want those sort of posts here, of course thats fine. But it is kind of shitty to delete them, especially with so much interaction already there. I’d encourage locking them and redirecting through a mod comment instead. If you can’t think of a more appropriate community for them, its likely they can’t either, which is why they posted here in the first place.

              Just my 2¢.

                • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Considering your application of the rules, I really dont think thats what you want. Unless you want me to go ahead and restore posts that (like other users per this thread) seem relevant enough to be here.

                  Quite a response to “here’s a way this could work better for everyone”, too.

                  But if its what you want, sure, I’ll do it.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      https://lemmy.world/post/39025760

      wtf? Half the post is nuked even after being locked. I don’t even see how such a small community can be so stuck up about relevancy and purity washing selfhosted as if we all own our own DNS registrars and can do outbound SMTP.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s a major pet peeve of mind when places get overly zealous about moderating what is on or off topic when the volume of posts doesn’t warrant it. Especially when there has already been some discussion on the posts.

    • atoro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Just glanced at it, but noticed a user (ayyy) was temp banned here 24 days ago for apparently telling a user to kys, then appointed mod here 45 minutes ago.

      Wat?

  • shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Not seen that on Lemmy, but it’s definitely been a problem on reddit for years. Agree with you - the questions and answers (and even the wrong answers) are valuable to anyone else searching for the same issue. “I got my answer, now fuck y’all”