• CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    No, they make sense, and I thank you for being transparent with your biases. That’s not common online, but it’s a standard I strive for and respect.

    The same kind of person who prefers manual transmission would prefer a gas engine. Let’s look at Mustang drivers. Nuff Said. (For those who don’t get it, Google “1969 Mustang Eleanor” and “Mustang EV”. One is a work of art. The other is a crime against automobile style or at least should never have been called Mustang — would have been a great opportunity to revive the Ford Galaxy brand.)

    • dkppunk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      I agree with most of what you’ve been saying, but I’m going to gently push back on the Mustang EV. I think it’s one of the best looking EVs out there and it would be the one that I would choose (or the Subie EV because I love my Crosstrek). I do agree that it probably should not have been called a Mustang though because it doesn’t really look like one and there’s a whole culture thing behind the Mustang.

      I would be thrilled if there was a manual shift EV. I know it doesn’t make sense and I don’t care if it doesn’t really do what combustion engines do, but I loved driving stick. I was sad to give up my old stick, but I went for the car with much higher safety ratings. It doesn’t even have to be real, just give me that feeling of driving manual would be great. And with a proper stick shifter too, not the silly paddle shifters.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      No one cares about the name behind a car. The original mustang was a high volume piece of shit car that only resonated with Boomers.