China’s secret services could use sensors and cameras in the cars to monitor secure areas, wiretap passenger conversations and access phones that are plugged into the vehicle, CSRI senior policy director Sam Goodman said.
All EV vehicles are spying. Teslas are rolling cameras with central cloud storage and Volkswagen was busted recently for leaking all locations of their cars. We shouldn’t label that as “Chinese spy-EVs”, but should enforce the GDPR for all cars
Automotive Grade Linux project is going to become way more important in time
Software is like encryption. you can’t trust it if it’s not auditable.
Well yeah but Automotive Grade Linux is open source fully (unless there is soemthing I didnt know as far I know) and is auditable
This is a horrible take. VW are diligent in following GDPR and as an owner (yes, I am) you are constantly asked for exactly which permissions you want to give what service.
They had a misconfigured S3 instance. While bad, that’s not intentional - but you’re comparing it to “At Tesla we wank to your in-car video feed” and “BYD spies for the Chinese government” which is just a whole different thing.
Misconfigured to the point that all the data was collected, centrally stored and then accessible from the outside. These are at least two misconfiguration and one mayor architecture issue (central storage).
I think your view on what happened is based on media headlines rather than the actual technical facts.
https://soundofdevelopment.substack.com/p/volkswagen-data-leak-location-tracking
Since Spring Boot version 1.5 is over 7 years old, that’s unlikely to be the cause. Instead, someone must have explicitly enabled the heap dump endpoint in production without authentication.
That is the major configuration problem that got the data accesible
Let’s recap. We now have user profiles showing which cars people drive and tracking data that sometimes spans years. While this data collection is covered in the terms and conditions for product improvement analysis, Volkswagen says they track this data to understand battery lifecycles better. Still, the need for location data remains unclear. The terms and conditions state that GPS data is truncated, which would significantly reduce tracking capabilities if accuracy drops to around 10 kilometers. Audi and Škoda implemented this correctly—cars from their fleet had location data truncated to approximately 10-kilometer accuracy. However, the problem arose with VW and Seat vehicles, where location data remained precise down to 10 centimeters.
That is the first configuration problem, to collect this data in the first place and then to collect it down to this level of precision.
This remains with the major architectural problem.
They could access complete user profiles and location data by combining this data. The breach revealed:
Enrollment data for both electric and non-electric vehicles, including details like VIN, model, year, and user ID
User data, including name, email, phone, and in some cases, physical addresses and preferred dealerships
EV data: Mileage, battery temperature, battery status, charging status, and even warning light data
Tracking data only for electric cars: GPS coordinates of the vehicles’ locations recorded every time the engine was turned off
All this data is stored in one place. Leaving aside the discussion of whether this data should be collected in the first place, there would be a strong reason to separate the data supposedly collected for technical analysis from the data that identifies who owns the car. Of course in the case of location data down to 10cm accuracy that is a bit moot as you can get the home address easily from the location data.
Please let me know if there was something i missed regarding my assessment of two configuration problems and one architectural problem.
Yeah, you missed how this is absolutely nothing like “we wank to you in-car videofeed”-Tesla and “we spy for the Chinese government”-BYD
A security hole exposing data that the users have agreed to share is nothing like companies willfully breaking user integrity.
You know this of course, you just don’t like being corrected.
Spy-EVs? How is that not fear mongering?
It literally says why up in the blurb. Do you want it to be normal for any state to have covert access to security cameras you own?
If I had to own a car right now I would be extremely annoyed. Seemingly every major production car right now is a data nightmare.
I think calling it fear mongering against EVs is right in the sense that it’s not exclusive to EVs. All cars have cameras, microphones and sensors these days and are connected, so legislation should deal with that properly.
We agree on that
That’s just the US government doing everything to sell more Teslas.
