For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ublock was already somewhat neutered on Chrome, and people didn’t seem to notice. They keep using it.

    I’m just so cynical these days. It’s not like the Windows XP era, where people eventually get fed up with enshittification, and move.

    Google won. Facebook won.

    They have absolute control, basically.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive…but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

      If they’d had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I’ve pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it’s clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It’s crazy!

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s because people don’t go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

          Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

            Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not even that hard to have targeted ads while still respecting privacy – just base the targeting on the other content on the page, rather than on the user.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It’s sickening.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            not enough, what they want is personal data to mine. they cant do that in simple terms. meta, glassdoor, indeed , linkden,(plaid) tries to use convoluted mehtods to get you to give up more personal data than you normally would in order to access the rest of the site.(glassdoor and indeed has an additional reason to want you ridentiy)

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone’s time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they’re not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      FF support is getting worse and worse though.

      Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

      Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

      Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        That isn’t FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure but if devs don’t test sites in Firefox then very they don’t support Firefox.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve answered this so many times.

          Banks, my uni, accounting software I use at work.

          Its a well acknowledged and much discussed fact that the web is buggy with ff.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fun fact: many sites that say that they don’t support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox “less secure” or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

        (Not all sites ofc)

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Fun fact: you don’t seem very bright.

          By “support FF” I mean “can be used in firefox or a derivative with comparable features to chrome”.

            • fizzle@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’m not talking about sites that claim not to support FF. I’m talking about sites that have broken features when visited in FF.

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Do you have any example? Can you send any link? I never experienced those problems myself so i want to try

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Chrome is doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by not following web standards. There are several websites I have used where the payment process or uploading process only worked in chrome.

                  Again, this is a problem with chrome doing things that breaks consistency between browsers that are supposed to be following the same web standards.

                • fizzle@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  This is very well documented, and a very common experience.

                  They were talking about exactly this on late night linux podcast just last week.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

              • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

                I still won’t actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

              • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                Unfortunately, we’re fighting an uphill battle here.

                We’d need government regulation “protecting privacy”, instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

                • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  Searching is already dead. Every search results in 200 Ai articles full of bullshit, even Qwant or DuckDuckGo.

                  The corpo-web died already, y’all are just crying over the scraps.

                • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  At which point they cease to be your favourites, I hope. There are so many alternatives in that space that only inertia keeps people using the Empire of Evil.

      • Seldon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For people who want an opinionated browser… Yes. They have sponsored shortcuts which cannot be disabled and they ghost out the option to in the settings. If you want to dig around the about:config and tweak things, fine, but I’d rather use a browser I can make my own. Librewolf is excellently bare bones.

        • M137@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Never seen those, and did a fresh install recently too. And zen has a lot of customization options, it’s also so damn well designed and is great to use.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sponsored shortcuts? They don’t have them, i did a clean install only some week ago so i doubt it’s a new thing

        • NakedNateRollerSkate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I haven’t seen any of those things yet, but I’ll try to keep an eye out. The only one I noticed was a default search engine to Google, but DDG was an easy enough option. I like libre wolf as well, but I’m not a fan of the updating scheme on my system.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won’t.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn’t work on firefox. It hadn’t been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.

          I assume the Chrome version still works. I’m not installing it.

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have degoogled Chromium installed because some things only work in a chrome browser. However it’s a special use case and I would barely notice if ublock was gone. I wouldn’t use it as a main browser anyway.

    • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Here? We’re a rounding error not worth considering.

      The majority of users do not use any web browser. They “click on the internet”.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Me.

      I use ungoogled chromium and librewolf, all day every day.

      Loada of sites just dont work in FF.

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Any PC I assist with has FF/UBO when I walk away. Now I have to strip out the AI shit too. So maybe I walk away with Waterfox on there now. Librewolf is too much for the average folk.

        • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Tip: if you install Firefox from scratch frequently, you should build a custom user.js where you disable all the stuff you don’t like, and then just drop the file in the profile directory with a script, instead of manually going through all the settings pages each time.

      • andz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s not completely true. I’ve had a fling with Vivaldi for a long time, but only for casual browsing on bookmarked sites I visit regularly (think forums, etc), but for anything serious, it’s obviously Firefox only.

        I always liked Vivaldi a lot, but I guess it’s about breakup time. It’s a damn ducking shame.

        You’d be hard pressed to find someone who thinks I’m not a “techy” person either, considering I’ve been building them since the early pentium era.

        For posterity, I can mention that Opera and then Vivaldi were the first two “not IE” browsers I ever switched to for myself. Got in some trouble as my parents thought that I "had deleted the Internet, their exact words…)

        Those were the days, heh.

        • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah and to be fair my main browser is Zen but I still have chrome and edge because I work on websites and need to make sure things work OK, they’re just not used for much else.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      the average person on lemmy probably cares more about privacy than the average internet dweller.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The average internet dweller doesn’t even know they’ve lost privacy.

        after all, their post has a delete button next to it and their messages say private! They wouldn’t just lie

        • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Where do their messages still say private? I’ve not seen that in years. The initialism “PM” seemed to get replaced by “DM” overnight. Also though, many of them didn’t lose privacy. Anyone, at the very least in USA, younger than the Patriot Act never had privacy to begin with.

        • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          100%

          Even many, many lemmy users believe there is a semblance of privacy on the internet today, or in national businesses with modern IP camera tech. It’s all gone.

          They have enough telemetry to know who you are between all the details the browser gives them. Hell, most people don’t even know what a tracking pixel is or how it has been used for well over a decade.

          We’re at the point with machine learning that the resources required to process all of these datapoints is trivial even when done onboard fairly cheap devices.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I worked on ad stuff for a very short time where they could tell if they showed you an ad a year ago, and another one, and then if you went to a store, that it was all connected. They would know if you went into a store with presence detection that their ad was working.

  • glockenspiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Zen still works beautifully. The only downside I’ve come across is that there isn’t a mobile app, so the ability to hand off isn’t there.

  • RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google realized how much money they were losing by supporting adblock in the first place. They also had way too many extensions with MV2 that requested full site access…

    At the end of the day, they want to force feed everyone advertisements. Often meant to make people angry or buy shit they don’t need.

    It’s also why apps like NewPipe are in an arms race with the recent sideloading app changes for Android.

    Inspired by the Ludovico Technique

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I swear I hate tabbed browsing, because it leads to people hording tabs like a freaking squirrel hordes nuts.

              If you need it for later, book mark it.

              If you’re done with it close it.

              • ericwdhs@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Bookmarks in mobile Firefox is another issue. Bookmark management is a massive chore. I end up keeping tabs around a lot longer in mobile just to avoid messing with it.

                On desktop Firefox with the Bookmark Tab Here extension (native functionality I missed from Chrome), bookmarking and organizing a new page is just two clicks. I use that workflow extensively. Apparently I have over 7000 bookmarks all organized that way.

              • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve started using Karakeep for this. If I haven’t used a tab in a while but want it to stick around, throw it to Karakeep, let ai tag it, then close that tab.

              • karashta@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                This doesn’t work when I have memory issues. That tab is open as part of my external system of memory for myself so I know what I was trying to do before one of my several issues prevented me finishing.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s still not pushed out to phones. I’m going to keep shit talking them until it’s actually out, because they’ve spent far too much time stringing them along

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Firefox doesn’t have this one feature I like so I will keep using browser made by an ad company. I’m sure there will be no consequences long term”.

            Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin

            “Oh shit. No one could have predicted this!”.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Firefox dragged its feet on an extremely useful feature for years.

              Are you seriously trying to act like Firefox hasn’t been continually shooting themselves in the foot the past decade?

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’ve been using Firefox for decades without issues. Yes, Chrome was a better browser for a long time but Firefox wasn’t that far behind and was absolutely fine browser to use.

                Do you really think Mozilla could win browser race with Google, the fucking second biggest company in the world? Of course Chrome had more features, it had basically unlimited resources at it disposal. But yeah, let’s blame Mozilla for not winning with them decisively.

                YOU are shooting yourself in the foot. You abandoned Firefox for couple of features and soon you will be browsing the web with ads. Come back and tell me how extremely useful Chrome’s features are when can you no longer skip Youtube ads.

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                While Firefox itself can still be installed and used on rooted or non-certified Android devices, some AI-powered features may not be available on those platforms.

                Yeah, that’s not a real issue for me. Is it for you?

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Brave has a certain distasteful reputation earned by repeated unethical fuckery. If you are fine with what brave does, you have no reason to avoid chrome in the first place.

          • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            For a lot of people, it’s an easy transition.

            DDG, Vivaldi, etc. harder transitions.

            Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

            I’m just saying perfect is the enemy of good.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Websites that are actively malicious against firefox, that miraculously work when you have a useragent plugin that makes firefox report that its chrome proving that the site works fine, if the asshole code is removed?

                • AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yup mostly because I don’t care anymore. You’re all stating the, “it works on my machine” mantra and I don’t care. See my other comments for some examples.

            • placebo@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right

              Sir, 2000s called and asked you to return this argument back.

            • Ilandar@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

              Very difficult to believe. I have had issues with Firefox over the years but in every sing[e instance it was a resu[t of my custom setup. The browser has no major compatibility issues out of the box. I think it’s way more likely your parents are technologically illiterate and confuse other problems or gaps in their knowledge as issues with the “new” thing (in this case, the browser).

            • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Firefox for my parents would result in calls every 3 days for sites that aren’t working right.

              Sorry, what? If they are so tech-illiterate that they have to call you and ask why the website is not working, then what kind of web sites are they visiting?

              Been using FF since 2022 and the only sites that wont work are the ones that utilizes HID. Are your parents trying to flash custom firmware for their phones though browser every third day?

                • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Been in tech longer then that (if for some reason we are doing that now) and I will officially call bullshit on that claim.

                • Mountainaire@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Wait, really? The access cripplers are crazily powerful add-ons for the paranoid, like NoScript, not the browser itself. Like what example websites, specifically?

                • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I get it that tech people stumble upon these sites much more often than non-techies. My point was that if your parents are having website issues every other day (which implies they are not tech-savvy), then why would they even visit sites that are not FF-compatible. How many sites out of all the web do you think are not compatible with FF? Give an example of a normie site that wont work well with FF.

                  On the other hand, if your parents are tech-savvy then why would they ask you why a website wont load properly? Do you get it that your statement counters itself?

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              After seeing all the people talking about Vivaldi in this thread I figured I’d try it out…got to the “Panel” setup page, saw there’s one for reddit, maybe I’ll try adding lemmy.zip…

              Failed Cloudflare check in panel, but it worked in a tab…okay, weird.

              Thought about checking out Kagi since now privacy is on my mind…the front page would reload every 5 seconds so I couldn’t read about it. It’d say “Verification failed please try again” and refresh.

              Apparently this has been an issue with Vivaldi for some time? I guess this is the future of the web? You try to escape the claws of these giant internet powerhouses and they just…don’t let you?

            • mittyta@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s true, unfortunately. Not every 3 days, but once a month I encount these sites.

          • sunbytes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            On iOS you can go on pornhub on brave and it blocks all the ads and cookie popups.

            That’s one reason that uh… “someone” might use brave.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Orion also blocks ads on iOS and isn’t backed by Thiel, run by Eich or an ad business startup masquerading as an ad blocking browser.

            • reka@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              My real issue is as a dev of a web application, using Firefox makes things occasionally render differently. It’s only once in a blue moon but enough to make me just accept using Vivaldi to be closer to the defacto user experience. And then I can’t be bothered to switch between FF (I use Zen) and Vivaldi and split my bookmarks, extensions, logins etc. it just doesn’t make sense.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ve only ever encountered one website where Firefox didnt work.

              and that was because the website was coded maliciously to reject firefox… a plugin to make it think firefox was chrome and suddenly it ran fine.

              • Sckharshantallas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well I did, the Amazon Prime Video has many weird behaviors on Firefox compared to the Chromium engine, even YouTube used to have before.

                Any web developer knows it isn’t as simple as “code once, work everywhere”. If companies don’t test on Firefox (which is a reality nowadays given its small market share) bugs happen in very weird and unusual ways.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Only issue I’ve ever had with Amazon Video was the fact they artificially limit resolution to 320p for people on linux, regardless of browser.

              • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Firefox doesn’t support WebHID, so I can forget about configuring my custom keyboard with anything other than a Chromium based browser.

          • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            People entirely blind to the idea that they can just choose something else instead of 2 piles of shit, one of which has a cherry on top and was sprayed with perfume recently.

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Brave is by a company who’s in the business of serving ads.

        Much like google was back in the day, they’re trying to obtain market share with a product that they can easily manipulate after the fact and rely on people not jumping ship as things get progressively worse and worse bit by bit

        Think of the “approved ads” era followed by the “enhanced security features” which made it so your block list couldn’t be updated at a moments notice and now it’s being stripped entirely.

        Better to avoid it entirely and just use Firefox or a derivative thereof

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s to stop the developers of a Chromium fork like Cromite from mainting MV2 compatibility themselves?

    Cromite’s only flaw (IMO) is that it based it’s built in adblocker on AdBlock instead of Ublock.

    I’ve tried moving to Firefox and I don’t know, it just feels ugh to me. (scientific critique, I know…). It’s just something I can’t put my finger on; Firefox just doesn’t feel performative. whether that’s a frame-buffer animation thing, or icon shadows, or something else entirely, it just feels off to me in some uncally valley sort of way.