Personally, my opinion is criminals should be tried and punished in the country they offend in. Sending them back to some other country is not justice and in some cases is a way for them to not face any punishment.
They often do not face any charges.
For example. Someone from Brazil allegedly murders someone in Canada.
So they get sent back to Brazil. Is Brazil government going to prosecute them for a crime in another country of which they didn’t conduct an investigation ? Where they have no jurisdiction?
It makes more sense that a person is held to the laws and justice of the people/country they did the crime in.
It’s up to everyone to learn the laws and punishment system of the government of the place they are in. And not break those laws. or suffer the consequences.
Personally, my opinion is criminals should be tried and punished in the country they offend in. Sending them back to some other country is not justice and in some cases is a way for them to not face any punishment.
They often do not face any charges.
For example. Someone from Brazil allegedly murders someone in Canada.
So they get sent back to Brazil. Is Brazil government going to prosecute them for a crime in another country of which they didn’t conduct an investigation ? Where they have no jurisdiction?
It makes more sense that a person is held to the laws and justice of the people/country they did the crime in.
It’s up to everyone to learn the laws and punishment system of the government of the place they are in. And not break those laws. or suffer the consequences.
Ever see the Star Trek episode “Justice”?
Yes.
I still think crimes should be prosecuted in the country they are committed in.
A few extreme examples doesn’t excuse letting off a bunch of criminals just because they are foreigners.
So where is the line between an “extreme” example and a “reasonable” example? Is 15 years of imprisonment for stepping on money reasonable to you?