• FedX@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    LMFAO! The whole thing is some doublethink BS, but this line really got me!

    The court noted that the Commission had failed to take into account that ⁠private ​jets could be flown ​on sustainable fuel.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The Commission also failed to consider that a private jet could crash, killing a billionaire, with a net positive effect for the Planet. Private jet manufacturing can be a very green activity if those private jets are not manufactured very well.

  • Jessicat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    The mental gymnastics behind this one… The carbon footprint is associated with using the plane, not making it duh! What on earth are we doing?

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      We are letting the billionaire parasites get away with polluting and destroying the planet and biosphere. I think we need to roll out the guillotines.

  • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    There may come a time when judges understand the details of what they are adjudicating on. This group seem to be at sea.