• edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh no 13 out of 257 members of the big tent party… And we still got a bunch in the primaries. Give your balls a tug.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      20% of the democratic party is progressive. Whats your big plan to win any election ever again without them? I would have thought losing the last election would touch you knuckleheads some math but here we go again.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        They genuinely would prefer to lose to a republican than let a socialist win, because a republican isn’t going to fuck up the bag for them.

        • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          None of you dumbfucks can read. What part of “elect progressives in democratic primaries to turn the democratic party into a progressive socialist party” do you not understand? This is literally the only point I’ve been making here, if all you stupid numpty motherfuckers voted for progressives in democratic primaries we’d have a fucking progressive party. But you dumb shits can’t even fucking read.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago
            1. Chill.

            2. I wasn’t disagreeing with you, this was a response to “Whats your big plan to win any election ever again without them?”, the answer is that they don’t have a big plan beyond “ratfuck progressives>do poorly in the general>occasionally win after the republicans get their way>ratfuck progressives”. They are OK with losing to republicans, hence all the deeply unpopular shit they did in 2024