• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    NATO assumption is that the Baltics will be largely overrun

    That WAS (past tense) the assumption. After the showing in Ukraine, both the ineptitude and the atrocities, you can be certain they’re planning on defending the Baltics from the start.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Yeah. It’s no longer okay to have a plan that says it’s okay if Russia takes some territory, we’ll just take it back a little later. We’ve now seen what happens to the people living in territory that happens to.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      So, apparently you are actually correct, although the change in posture is much more recent than you think. As in, within the last few weeks to months.

      I will not be saying more on this because I’ll get people in trouble if I do.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        I have no idea if that is the official policy, in any case official policy lags far after ideas come around. After Russia failed to take Ukraine in 3 days, you can rest assured discussions started pretty quickly about holding on to the Baltics. Nothing top secret about that, you can just think it through.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have no idea if that is the official policy

          That’s OK. I do.

          Like I said, you’re right, though the change was recent enough that I hadn’t been aware of it until I double checked.

          You’re wrong about the reasons why the posture changed, but I really can’t get into that.