That’s such a small number. I bet there might be one or two near you even. You can just Google it!

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    And that goes for all of these fucking leeches: The beloved pop star. The legendary athlete. The really nice lady who gave away ten billion. The soft-spoken revered investment guru who cosplays as middle class.

    Every damn one of them should be paying 100% in taxes over a billion dollars, but they never will. Their greed is a more important consideration than whether or not you can get health care.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      100% over a billion

      million
      fine, I’ll settle for 10 million

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, a flat amount will never work. Make it a multiple of some figure, like average wage. That way it actually changes with inflation and we don’t have a situation where the the inflation adjusted minimum wage is 6 times the actual federal minimum wage.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ya, that seems reasonable.

            I think it’s a pretty core democratic value that no person is worth more than another. A compromise of 1 million times should satisfy individuals with even the most acute case of wealth hoarding.

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Make it so that if poor people earn more, the rich pay less taxes… Or something, that might actually not function.