Context: Admiral Patrick replied and included this gem:

And might I add that not one person complained until db0 went internet Karen with his hissy fit because I took his toy away from him.

“Not one person complained about my explicitly obfuscated blacklists! Damn internet Karens making a big deal!”

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    the snuck the ban list in in such a way you couldn’t review it or even know of its existence.

    *In such a way that it made it slightly harder to review it or know of its existence.

    Any thorough look at the source code would notice it loading that list at runtime. And also notice it getting called and referred to in other parts of the code when it checks whether or not to block something. And that’s not hypothetical, of course – we’re only talking about it because somebody did check, and it was found.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      we’re only talking about it because somebody did check, and it was found.

      If it was closed source no one would’ve know, common open source W

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        You can still decompile things in closed source, which is what basically had to be done to identify this was happening.

        Its about as scummy and antithetical to fediverse culture as could possibly be.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 days ago

          It’s harder to look in to it though, especially with obfuscation techniques and you need asm knowledge