• WormFood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    The usefulness of alphafold had been grossly overstated by science media. The structures it generates are mostly nonsense, they typically can’t generate molecular dynamics simulation trajectories with the correct physical properties, which makes them not useful for drug discovery. in computational biology today you’ll most often find them in use as a starting point for structure refinement or as one of many sources of data for some integrative method. Again, not useless, and an improvement over previous structure prediction algorithms, but they didn’t ‘solve protein folding’ or anything, like Google might have you believe. I don’t put much stock in Nobel prizes, I mean, they gave one to Henry Kissinger.

    Google also released alphafold 3 under a strict non commercial license, which severely limited its usefulness for both commercial and academic work, the latter of which all but requires using more permissive licenses. I assume Google wanted to monetize a commercial version of it at some point.

    I’ve been using Openfold 3 in some work I’ve been doing recently, and while the software is a bit undercooked, it does produce structures similar to alphafold 3 without any of Google’s bullshit. So I wouldn’t worry too much about this announcement. The protein folding will continue with or without them

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Though it does suck that attention is being diverted to LLM development because it’s so good at giving the illusion of being smart while still getting so much wrong.

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    In 2011 Google surreptitiously edited, “don’t be evil”, from its mission statement. Voila!

      • terabyterex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        so letting a person own their own company is evil? we just hand it to the government?

        this is about greed not capitalism… which is private ownership. our government is just as greedy

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Yes, letting a person own a means of production leads to greed and they, unlike government, are not able to be voted out. They just grow more powerful and stupid drunk on wealth and they do stupid shit that destroys economies and environments and societies and surround themselves with yes men so they never have to hear about the consequences of their actions from anyone “important”.

          Elon musk should not own the space program. Jeff Bezos should not own all retail. Palmer Luckey should be “disrupting” defense.

          You are not a capitalist, you are a worker with Stockholm syndrome. Fuck capitalism, it’s time for it to go. It’s antiquated and unnecessary.

      • notsure@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        As Trump would say, “who knew healthcare could be so hard?”, at least french people know how to protest…

  • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    The cost in preventable deaths, had we been continuing protein research instead of pouring the world’s resources into a fancy autocorrect, is incalculable.

    • Archer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Honestly they could’ve pointed AI at this problem to try and rack up at least some positive AI press coverage

        • sexhaver87@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Actual, real, machine-learning artificial-intelligence. Not this sycophantic human mimic shit everybody’s fallen head over heels for. At the very bare-minimum comparison, AlphaFold had an established use-case.

    • AAA@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      But you need to understand, preventing deaths doesn’t make Google any money. Please think about the poor corporation!

      • swoopy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I think this is a miscalculation on Google’s part because dead people can’t buy their products.

        • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          People don’t buy products anymore. They’re too poor to care about. Businesses sell to governments and other businesses now and couldn’t care less what you want or think.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    We just need a blanket ban on generative AI. The societal costs are just too high, we can’t bear it. We can continue on our path like this for years and dig ourselves into a deeper hole before admitting it, or we could just admit it now and save ourselves the pain.

    I know what I would vote.

  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Funny, one of the first arguments I had about AI was with someone who insisted it would be incredibly helpful at predicting protein folds.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        So this may be why Google is closing AlphaFold; AI is already doing it.

        If you have no idea what Alphafold is, why comment on it. Fucking Lemmy…

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        To be clear, I wasn’t necessarily disagreeing about AI’s utility, just about how protein fold AI isn’t the same as LLM AI; we’ve used computer models for predictions of protein structure and genetic mutation severity for a while, though they have always been taken with a grain of salt that I fear is no longer being done - a prediction is still a prediction, after all. Doctors were already incorrectly confusing computer model predictions of genetic mutation severity for positive test results back when I was working as a genetic counselor in the 2010’s - my concern is that the widespread trust of “AI” is only going to exacerbate that.

        I’m a bit confused, though. The AI doing it was AlphaFold, which is shutting down. Shouldn’t your statement be AI was already doing it? Gemini is an LLM - not the same type of thing as AlphaFold, despite the fact that they’re both called “AI,” which was the cause of my original argument. The AI that was doing the protein fold prediction is being replaced with an “AI” that can’t. It looks like there’s still RoseTTAFold, but losing the frontrunner is still not great when it’s shutting down to focus more on LLM’s.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The article also talks about a spinoff of AlphaFold……

          I didn’t click into what that spinoff was but maybe an even better headline is “for profit company creates a free AI to predict protein folding and is moving to monetize it”