• Nugscree@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    THE FUCKING ADS SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN THERE, THAT’S WHY I SWITCHED OVER TO STREAMING.

    Sorry everybody had to get that out of my system.

  • Starya67@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ooh, that’s like Morphe for Youtube that allows you to skip sponsors, “click subscribe” blahblah and other stuff.

  • callous_trog@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Spotify owns megaphone. Megaphone embeds the ads in podcasts. It’s sort of not in their interest to offer this feature. However, YouTube has this feature already. I’d guess they are mostly trying to stay competitive?

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    why stop there? they should add minutes of metal screeching at max volume on random places and make new super premium that lets you skip that too. the possibilities are infinite!

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    What the actual fuck is going on when you put the fast forward button behind a paywall??

    • nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not the regular Fast Forward button.

      In our tests, a “Skip Ahead” button appears on-screen as soon as an ad-break starts. Just one tap of the “Skip Ahead” button moves a listener to the beginning of the next section, after the ads have finished. It only appears for ads, promos or intros.

    • Peanut@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Is already standard for companies to further ‘optimize’ by creating problems that they can charge extra to solve.

      I mean, advertising to begin with is just a way for people with existing capital to make themselves more salient regardless of their product quality.

      But if you don’t even need a product and can charge people for the right not to have every experience made worse, or more annoying or time consuming, the whole point of the market has lost the plot at the expense of the people.

      Like paying rent on features that have traditionally just been available after purchasing a thing, like vehicle seat heating.

      Only going to get worse unless we change out of a system built entirely around individualized extraction and competition.

  • angband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Then, in a few years, they’ll offer advertisers super premium ads. Users will be able to buy ultra premium tier subscriptions to skip those.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Podcasts have ads directly in the audio, similar to sponsorship ads in YouTube videos and on other platforms directly in the video the creator uploads. I was wondering when an open source solution to that would come out, similar to sponsorblock for YouTube, but I guess Spotify is first.

      Podcasts are still slightly different, as the easy pliability of audio means podcast hosts inject ads based on your location and other factors into the audio stream instead of just going with one single global ad for everyone. But you still only get the audio stream from the regular podcast host, which is why classic ad blockers don’t work. A community-run solution might be "for podcast id 123 skip from audio fragment “sponsor” to “welcome back”. Just purely going by time (skip from 10:00 to 10:30) wouldn’t work, as ads can be longer or shorter. There can also be multiple ads back to back even if they’re a standard length.

      A service like Spotify at least partially hosts its own podcasts and probably does the ads for those podcasts itself, so it can just leave them out. If Spotify proxies podcasts from elsewhere, it can detect (via querying the podcast multiple times from different locations) where the dynamic bits of the podcasts are and cut them out. That could also be a community solution, though it would require more computational resources. A centralized service like Spotify makes it easier. Spotify is also AI-happy, and what they’ve actually done might be to just train an AI on ad segments, and let the AI cut those segments out.

      By the way, YouTube already skips some creator sponsorships with their premium service.

    • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I guess podcasts do.

      I cannot think of a single good podcast. I say that, then someone recommends six. I listen to a few, each just as insufferable as the next. Same shit each and every one. Some twatwaffle just blathering about nonsense.

      I don’t know a single intelligent person who listens to them.

      If you get blasted with boner pill ads during a podcast, you deserve it.

      I wish Spotify would make the default view music and not books and podcasts.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The only podcast I actually got into was the Always Sunny podcast, which kinda ended abruptly when their schedules got too hectic. I tried Dropping Names with Jonathan Frakes and Brent Spiner but after a few episodes it got kinda dull with their mostly posting demeanor and them trying to just shoehorn as many names into stories as possible.

            • ifalas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’ve been listening to the various microbe.tv podcasts for probably 15 years at this point, This Week in Virology and This Week in Parasitism being my favorites (RIP Dickson Despommier). Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe even longer. Some people seem to only be aware of hollywood celebrity podcasts.

          • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            What I liked about Always Sunny podcast was it was the guys watching the episodes for the first time and would usually share a lot of great behind the scenes content while also BSing. If you’ve watched the whole series multiple times it’s really entertaining.

    • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Spotify is terrible for artists and pays peanuts compared to other services like Tidal. I understand the app is great, but it is not worth it. Spotify is all in on AI music to save even more money. Terrible company.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I understand the app is great

        It’s not even that great anymore. In the recent years the app got bigger and bigger, the UI more confusing, it got intrusive features that are impossible to disable while not adding anything of value.

        For example, it started playing distracting, ugly. looped videos by default with no clear way to disable this. At the same time it became impossible to say “don’t play this song even again”.

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m pretty happy not using Spotify. I will continue to do so. My library of drm free music (mostly from Bandcamp) is just fine.

    • mschae@discuss.mschae23.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Same. I can also recommend the Qobuz download store, which has a larger library because they get their music from the usual distributors.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Premium users

    enabled them to skip ad breaks

    Does not compute. Wtf is the point of paying for premium when you still get ads?

    • hexdream@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      So they can say they listened to users when they launch premium super plus without ads. Repeat ad infinitum (pun intended i suppose).

    • ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have discontinued many subscription based services due to all the price hiking and/or changing features I originally paid for.

      Reading headlines like this always reassures me I’ve made the right choice. I used to pay for Amazon Prime (and the other sub channels that had content I enjoyed), Netflix, Spotify, Crave+Sportsnet. All of it replaced by YouTube Premium which I do get most of my money out of with its features including ad free music.

      It’s been a couple years since I closed all my premium subscriptions and every so often I’ll get an email asking me to rejoin for 5.99 for 3 months and regular pricing thereafter (or similar price points), which only tells me the price hiking isn’t at all vital, it’s having your credit card information. It’s simple greed.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have it, it skips podcast intros and the podcast baked in sponsors.

      I would do it anyway with the 15 second button but this is fairly accurate and a single press.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The content creator won’t care but the sponsors might. YouTube has a similar system that skips over “commonly skipped segments” when you’re fast forwarding. In practice it just means you skip past the section of the video where whoever it is reads the sponsors ad copy. It would have gotten skipped anyway, this feature just saves you a few seconds of putzing around trying to find the exact spot where the ad ends.

  • Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Congratulations on reproducing the technology brought to us by DVRs decades ago!

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was also built in to all stereo systems long before that. Not that LPs ever had ads, but I could dub to tape off the radio and then fast forward through the ads.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Its akin to paying for a movie and being pissed off that Mercedes paid to have their car in it.

      The people we are listening to have sponsors and deals. I would prefer they didnt but it is what it is.

      • SatyrSack@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        A character simply driving a Mercedes car is one thing. But podcast ads are more akin to a movie character entirely interrupting the flow of the film to stop and talk for two minutes straight about how great Mercedes is and to recite a series of specifications about that model car and gush at what a low price it is.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Transformers did it bud lite. The difference is one if meant to have a fourth wall.

          I’m not defending ads, I hate them and block them almost entirely. And fuck spotify, their product gets worse every year. But its not spotify being shite to premium subs that podcasters have sponsors.

    • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have premium family, but the only ads I hear are the ones that creaters put in themselves. I don’t mind those as much.

      Edit: what joe said

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I have Spotify premium (the one single subscription habit I allow myself) and haven’t heard an ad for years. But that is for music.

      They are talking about when Spotify is used for podcasts and long form content, where creators often insert sponsored sections by themselves.

      • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Out of all the subscriptions you picked the one
        which makes one person richer on basis of other peoples media.

      • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I cancelled because Spotify was injecting their own ads in my podcasts. Like clearly injected ads and not the podcasters’ embedded ones. Not sure if they are still doing it but that was the last straw for me as a long time premium member.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re talking about the ads in podcasts put there by the podcasters. Not ads put there by Spotify.

  • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s fine when I do it, but introducing this as default in Spotify will reduce the value of ad-reads, and I’m guessing Spotify won’t make up the difference to producers.