• kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    my experience, that all my collegues who are aroubd 28-35, use a shitload of ai. younger generation is now using it instead of google search.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s because they fucked the google search so that ai is the only thing that gives you what you’re looking for. Eventually. After you’ve argued with it.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        At least google’s ai will list the sources it’s allegedly drawing from so you can verify it’s hallucinations live.

  • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    With ai hallucinations…Ai fakery and the topmost reason being layoffs being attributed increasingly to AI…I don’t think so there’s anything much to love about AIs. When billionaires tell the society to love something… it’s because there’s 10000% profit for them in that and almost none for us masses.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    billionaires tell people to love the thing they are trying to get them hooked on so that they can run a rampant monopoly and make some more billions.

    If you remove yourself from the equation maybe there is some chance. So if you really love AI, perhaps fuck off.

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They’re already dumber than the older generations, but hey, we can make the problem even worse. Why not.

    I’m gonna have to work until I’m 110 years old probably just to keep the following generations fed and clothed… and I bet at least one of you morons will think “it’s the billionaires’ fault”. Try to actually read a real book.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      and I bet at least one of you morons will think “it’s the billionaires’ fault”.

      Well, yeah, you’re kinda right. It’s the system that creates these billionaires fault. One of the reasons I dislike all the guillotine memery a bit (although I find it pretty funny) is because just unaliving Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk won’t help in the long run. The system is gonna continue to produce these kind of psychopaths.

  • BigBoyShuanzee@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ve been in IT since 2007 I’ve been with computers since 1994 with a second hand MS DOS.

    AI is 100 very good for scientists and people in the medical industry (I don’t know why, but I know they’ve all told me it’s good for them). Outside of the above… Everything else about AI is pointless… It’s just googling things slightly faster than I can google things.

    • Hathaway@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Interestingly, in the medical field, I have seen a few headlines, but, I was talking to a guy who works for Mayo Clinic. His job is literally trying to quantify the effects AI is having with the doctors, and talking with him I said the same thing “at least it’s good for the medical field” and he replied with “who told you that? I would actually love to speak with them.” So, I’m not sure how effective it is in the medical field either.

    • ludo@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mainly use it for comparing products, and finding tools/products that fit my needs (sustainability/longevity/value/complexity/learning curve/beginner friendliness). I find it to be really time saving for this particulqr purpose. Customer service agents should be forgotten by history ASAP.

      • aceshigh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Prepare to get downvoted and get critical comments. People really hate llms here. It’s just as annoying as the people on the flipside.

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So your use case for LLMs is the first aspect of them that will be enshittified.

        LLMs advocating for products that pay them is step 1 of incoming enshittification.

        Also, anyone that has ever talked to customer service of any kind knows that the “automated” stuff is the absolute worst and you want a human most of the time.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Never underestimate me how out of touch business management can be.

      There’s a saying- corporate consultants are people who charge millions to tell you what your employees and customers have been trying to tell you for free.

  • Archon_Warslut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    theyre not the ones being billed for it; dont worry what they think. ai spending is in enterprise situations. mostly coding/tech companies and finance companies, and well lots of companies. the big payers though are coders and finance. there isnt really anything to not trust. it codes and answers questions and picks stocks. nobody’s hooked it up to skynet. nobody’s built skynet. the billionaires borrowed more money than they can afford unless their ai models win long term. i think theyre in a semi-humbled moment.