• Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mostly drink apple or orange juice now

    I’m pretty sure this is the intended purpose of the law.

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      As an adult, I can smoke, drink, eat all sorts of shit, but I cannot have a sugary drink unless it’s coke because shops stopped selling them. The law was intended to discourage, not prohibit. I actually drink more coke too now as it’s only soft drink I can buy that doesn’t taste like chemicals.

      For reference, kids in schools can drink shit filled with artificial sweeteners. They can get chocolate with their lunch and trust me, they treat themselves to chocolate and a Prime on their way home.

      This law didn’t protect health, just move folk to substitutes that aren’t necessary better for them. States shouldn’t be preventing consenting adults making decisions with their own health.

      Hell, the food is still largely unregulated with ridiculous levels of sodium which is ridiculous for heart disease.

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        After the first one. One is likely good for you, but more and it’s a bit like drinking coke. Pulp based smoothies are more healthy through.

        • glasratz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          No. Juice is not good for you. And smoothies are still worse than fresh fruit. And fruit is still worse than vegetables.

          • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            “A plausible explanation as to why fruit juices may lead to different health effects from those of sugar-sweetened beverages is that fruit juices are a source of various bioactive compounds, such as vitamins (vitamin C, folate, etc.), minerals (mostly potassium), and antioxidants [73], while sugar-sweetened beverages generally have none. Antioxidants were shown to decrease oxidative stress [91], which plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, diabetes, and dyslipidemia [92].”

            https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/5/1006

            Please don’t spout opinions not based in fact.

            There is more to fruit juice than just sugar.

            • glasratz@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Please don’t post excerpts from studies without reading the conclusion. This study doesn’t conclude what you want it to. The sentece about antioxidants for example is about antioxidants in general and not about whether their consumption in fruit juices has health benefits. The study basically says there’s a lack of data to assess the situation.

              Here, look at this more recent study that compared different kinds of fruit juices.

              https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213453024001915

              It concludes that fruit juices have less health risks the more they resemble fresh fruit.