• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Cool. I’m not offended by that. 28th member sounds respecta. 51st state, not so much. 😂

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nah we just need a fancy team name for the not-absolute-fuck-head countries.

    I mean EU is Europe and I fucking love you guys but down here in Australia we can’t just up and move the continent to Europe.

    I don’t think the name should be dependent on membership like BRICS or whatever because you don’t want to have to rebrand when you kick someone out or let someone in.

    I think it should include a word like collaborative because honestly, that’s what it’s about - we’re better off working together.

    It’s also important to choose a name with a catchy acronym that isn’t already taken.

    Maybe Collaborative Union of Nice Terran States.

    • Matombo@feddit.org
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      EBU EU whats the difference?

      If Australia can be part of the Eurovision song contest so It can be of the EU. Also everybody already asume anyway that you are just Austria.

    • Solon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      But its about European values. Compassion, democracy, empathy, forgiveness and freedom

      • vrojak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I still would not call them European values, it comes of as values that exist in Europe and nowhere else. And I’d rather have compassion, democracy etc everywhere.

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      You just answered yourself. Just call it CUNAFHC - Collaborative Union of Not-Absolute-Fuck-Head-Countries

      • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not true, there’s also we poor countries who can’t afford hanging around with the nice guys in the block

        • EstonianGuy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well who says you cant join up? An alliance like NATO doesnt have a price tag except for the 2% minimum defence limit, but it’s 2% subjective to your income. So you literally can afford that.

          • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes but then you’d need NATO’s approval. Remember how Erdogan put all sorts of 'but’s to Finland and Sweden, countries with way more wealth (and more arguments to be included in NATO) than one like mine

  • stormdahl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It doesn’t really make sense for Canada to be a member of the EU simply because Canada isn’t in Europe. What we could do is grant Canada a deal similar to what Norway has now. We’re one of four members of EFTA, which are part of the EEA without being EU members.

    I must admit that my knowledge of Canada is shallow at best but my impression is that its overall values align well with western European democracies.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    As much as I like Canada compared to the US, they are not European by any stretch of the imagination. I’d be for free trade and free movement as a beginning, but part of the European Union is a bit much.

    • doodledup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s not possible by current legislation aswell. You need to be on the European continent to join the EU.

      • crisinho@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fun fact: being located on the European continent is actually not a requirement. It is only mentioned that you need to be “European” which is open to interpretation (although, of course the continent comes to mind first). It basically says you have to have some relation towards being European, whether that is by politics, culture or by location (preferrably all of the above).

        The best example would be Cyprus, which is actually located on the Asian continent but is culturally closer to Europe than Asia.

        Canada feels like one of the more “European” leaning countries considering this. That said, I think the chance of them joining the EU in the close future admittedly feels pretty low. But you never know, maybe the EU evolves into something of a counter concept to whatever is happening in the USA right now.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, technically you just need to be “European”, which is never strictly defined anywhere. It was being considered that Algeria join after all, but it didn’t happen because of the civil war (from my understanding of the situation). Canada is one of the most European-like non Europe countries, so it would kinda fit.

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, the EU has a whole bouquet of options for countries that want to cooperate with it. It can be trade agreements, free trade area, currency union, Schengen Area and so on. Norway, Switzerland and Turkey are examples of different degrees of associated status.

      But be aware that any full EU membership would non-negotiable include the right of not only companies but also people to move freely in the common area - yes, that would mean that any EU citizen has the right to move to and live in Canada, and vice versa, as long as these persons can support themselves.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Not really. It prevents countries from bearing the burden of maintaining other nation’s unemployed, incapacitated, etc…

  • SuperZorro@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    From the limited stuff I know about Canada, please no. They only seem reasonable because they are only ever compared to usa.