Just like https certificate authorities, the only way to fight all the AI slop will be “trusted” camera firmware that signs every image with a full chain of trust that the output was a real physical video taken will a real device at a real location.

  • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most of these are very impractical for the average person. Nobody is constructing lenses just to fake some ai videos. Usually it’s good enough to just deter 99% of the population from the crime. If a bit of AI slop gets through that’s fine.

    For important photo/videos, there will naturally be more scrutiny, and a camera signature won’t be enough. For example maybe the photographer would have to embed their identity in the photo. So if they are ever caught making ai photos, all their previous media is invalidated as well.

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Who talks about average people? The whole trust and cert system is only needed to guard against criminal actors or other people/organization’s with ill intend. And such people are not average at all.

      Embeding identity is problematic too, identity theft and stolen certificates are not that uncommon. This would create a whole new class of attacks.

      • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Anybody could become a criminal if the crime is easy, undetectable, doesn’t seem that morally wrong, and provides some benefit. So to deter the crime you need to change one of those factors. In this case, raising the difficulty bar.

        • Magiilaro@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you like a dark dystopian future? Because a mindset like this is how you get a dark dystopian future.

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            No I’m quite against hardware based trackers. At least ones that cannot be modified (for example secure boot is fine if the factory keys can be replaced).

            Which is why it’s important that we recognize just how powerful hardware trackers can be, and that the only way to fight this is at the population level. Publicly shame companies that try to introduce this tech, fight for privacy regulation, and don’t buy spyware devices.