In January, the New York Police Department’s counterterrorism unit sent out a memo warning police officers about a new potential “security and counterintelligence” threat: Ray-Ban Meta glasses.

The memo directed officers to “conduct thorough inspections of all eyewear permitted within inmate cells” and cautioned that people who have been arrested could use these glasses, equipped with small cameras and microphones, to record inside police facilities. The memo cited two examples of such videos posted on social media.

“The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    So it’s okay for crooked fuckers to use flock cameras to stalk women but it’s not ok for us to record you using smart glasses?

    How about a compromise? You shove the cameras up your ass, and we also get rid of the perv glasses because fuck that.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    “If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide.” Isn’t that the mantra of the police and secret services everywhere when they demand more intrusive snooping rights?

    So what do they do wrong that they suddenly have something to hide?

  • GarboDog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s why they’re worried about them??…. That’s a huge ass obvious red flag if we’ve ever seen one

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    For recording in cells, the glasses would be caught by the regular scanners used at various security boundaries including upon entry to custody, at least every time I’ve been detained. Is that not normal in the US?

    I mean, critical support to Meta I guess. They finally figured out a real use case for their glasses. Albeit a very limited one because there’s already hidden cameras people can wear on their body, all of which are easily detectable when they search you before chucking you into a cell.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    “The ability to covertly record inside a law enforcement or detention facility, could result in a security risk if proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released,” the memo read.

    what a load of absolute shit. the devices could open them up to the legal consequences of their illegal actions and abuse.

    shame meta is focused on equipping the perverts and creeps instead of the blind and exposing corruption and abuse.

  • MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    proprietary information about cell layouts, camera placements, or officer patrol/site protection routines are released

    All semi-valid concerns. Is anybody else smothering from the overwhelming mass of concerns between-the-lines here?

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Someone with a good memory and reasonable drawing skills could get all that info without needing the glasses. Besides that, how many of those items could be discovered with a FOIA request? I’m sure building plans and stuff are filed with the county permitting office.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The difference between those concrete facts they’re openly concerned about and the between-the-lines concerns they are not stating is: those other concerns are a matter of observation, recollection, testimony in court - and they can’t have objective evidence disagreeing with their own testimony as to what may or may not have transpired within their “controlled areas.”

  • Smaile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh no, that would be going tooo Farr…

    Dead ass I wish the worse for many in power.