• Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We’re too dependent on a technology that we spent tens of billions of dollars researching and perfecting over decades of research!

    Possibly the dumbest statement I’ve heard this week.

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not as dumb as you make it out. The issue isn’t that GPS is really, really good at what it does; it’s that it’s also incredibly vulnerable to disruption and spoofing. And due to the particulars of how GPS works, we can’t entirely fix that. We can do some things to ameliorate it, but a lot of those aren’t suitable for smaller things that use GPS today.

      The other thing is that GPS largely replaced a tremendous number of other navigation aides and techniques, including other radio-navigation systems like LORAN-C.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s also just a generally bad idea to be too dependent on a single system. If GPS reception fails for one reason or another, it would be good idea to have a backup.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s also just a generally bad idea to be too dependent on a single system.

          You’re saying this in the world where SMS is considered good for 2FA, and PSTN identifier is considered as good as your citizen’s ID, and people’s lives depend on systems incorporating NodeJS and Kubernetes. Yeah, by the way, Docker everywhere, and all the POSIX standardization and source-compatibility to allow different systems adhering to standards … have lost to Linux just becoming another main target.

          But yes! It’s a bad idea. Also it’s typical now for these systems to start lying in warzones where their owners don’t want one of the sides to have satellite navigation. They then give shift maps or whatever to the side they want to win.

  • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    In comes starlink to the rescue. But in typical Musk fashion it won’t doesn’t do what’s advertised and cost a shit ton more

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s literally him convincing someone to sell their house that they own outright to rent from him because it’s somehow much better (for him of course). It’s so fucking stupid.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remember that time he claimed Teslas windows were shatterproof and indestructable. Then he throws a baseball and the window instantly shatters?

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          And was the second time that window had the ball bearing thrown at it. They’d tested it backstage but didn’t replace that window for the on stage demo, so it was already weakened.

  • vaprz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What if we built a system of beacon transmitters that sent out pulses and then used recievers that would compare arrival times of those pulses to make a measurement, thus establishing positional location?

    We could call it the Long Range something or other. I’m open to suggestions. Need a catchy name!

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    How do we call these assholes and tell them to get their heads out of Muskovitch’s ass?

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I live in an area with a lot of iron. I cannot trust a compass to always point north. Generally I’ve had no problems in the woods: follow the trails that are on the maps, or at least stay close enough that you can always find them again and you are fine. (until of course you are not)

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re already are multiple alternatives to GPS. GPS is the American navigation system, but there’s also GNSS which is mostly used in Europe and Scandinavia. There are other systems for other parts of the world, even the North and South pole now.

    Everyone just uses GPS universally though.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      there’s also GNSS which is mostly used in Europe and Scandinavia

      GNSS is the generic term that covers all satellite navigation systems (GPS included).

      Galileo is the EU/ESA system you’re thinking of.

      GLONASS (Russian) and BeiDou (Chinese) are the other two major constellations with global coverage. The only other full system I know of is NavIC, which is Indian and has only regional coverage.

      Most devices actually connect to all of them. I’ve just checked my phone, and it’s connected to all of GPS, Galileo, GLONASS and BeiDou. People just say “GPS” because it’s catchier than “GNSS”.

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why not just stop being reliant on cars… you know… put down more rail… use… trains…