Their point was that thinking there’s a one way directionality associated with the term between specific races is a seemingly unique US perspective. Elsewhere that directionality doesn’t exist and it’s understood that it can go any direction, even if the bigotry exists there too.
Yes, they corrected what they said, but the original comment says it’s seen as wrong everywhere, and it isn’t. I’m not going to debate this any further. I don’t know why you’re arguing with me. I agreed that it’s just called racism in my first comment. What is your goal?
Their point was that thinking there’s a one way directionality associated with the term between specific races is a seemingly unique US perspective. Elsewhere that directionality doesn’t exist and it’s understood that it can go any direction, even if the bigotry exists there too.
Yes, they corrected what they said, but the original comment says it’s seen as wrong everywhere, and it isn’t. I’m not going to debate this any further. I don’t know why you’re arguing with me. I agreed that it’s just called racism in my first comment. What is your goal?
You doubling down on being wrong, and me pointing it out, is not me arguing with you. There’s no edit marker on that comment. Keep digging that hole.