The platform says hackers targeted a firm that helped to verify the ages of its users.

From 2025.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I hope I never gave them that. I had Nitro for a bit, but I don’t think I would have ever willingly gave them that.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    So so so so so misleading to post this when this will be interpreted as an event from 2026. Post should be removed IMO.

      • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I get that. I mean, that’s how I knew to come down here and say that it was misleading. But surely we can agree it’s strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what’s been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news. Like, the 2025 part is only needed because the post is misleading to begin with

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          But surely we can agree it’s strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what’s been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news.

          Now that Discord has begun rolling out the ID verification that they postponed a few months ago, I think it’s a pretty important reminder. And as was said, the post title specifically says “(2025)”

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    We told you this would happen. We told you this would be the result of “age verification”. As usual, you fucking didn’t listen.

    I hope Discord is sued into receivership over this.

    • Killer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Discord isn’t the one that got hacked and leaked the info, it’s whatever 3rd party they used.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Discord vetted and chose that vendor. They are liable, and as a corporate person, their corporate charter should be revoked until it has served 70,000 sentences of accessory to identity theft.

        Unless we are a nation of cowards and weaklings of course. So who are we?

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          💯, absolutely agree. 3rd party or not it’s completely irrelevant. That personal info is out in the wild and that is the point.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        that’s just a feeling, right? there’s no prior experience that could trigger that, right? *nudge, nudge. wink, wink.*

        Anyway, miraculously i haven’t been hit with the age-wall yet, bur when i do, Discord will lose a user.

        • njordomir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, it’s a shame this didn’t come 1-2 years earlier before discord got its claws in more stuff. Discord really caught on in my corners of the internet in the last 2 years. Before that, it was just my Minecraft pals. Even creators who freed themselves from the advertising machine by going fan-funded on Patron style sites still use discord to communicate. I hate to see them hit by boycott action against Discord, but if you stand on an archery range, don’t be surprised when you have a bunch of arrows sticking out of your noggin. ¯\(ツ)/¯

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I checked and both of my accounts are considered adult apparently, so hopefully they won’t change that in the future for me and that will be the end of that for me.

    • Sebeck0401@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, they’ve changed. This time they’ll keep the data safe, for realsies, pinky promise. Im sure they even gave their employees a stern talking to!

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      First ive heard of it.

      Also not trying to be rude but is this Technology or Technology news? Like I keep seeing people post things but if there not like the newest tech, they get downvoted. Im not saying thats incorrect but Id like to know in case I post what the distinction is.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Either way it’s important to convey that this article is old and it didn’t happen a second time.

        This makes it sound current.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        In my opinion, no, Technology is “the application of scientific knowledge to the practical aims of human life”. A data breach is not an application of scientific knowledge in any way.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        is this Technology or Technology news?

        What’s the difference?

        I keep seeing people post things but if there not like the newest tech, they get downvoted

        Probably just because the vast majority of modern tech news is horrendous and exploitative. Something the users of this platform are attuned to.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Tech news and articles”.

        Since this is purely a news article, it’s of little value a year later, when a more up-to-date article about verification would have more current information.

        If it was about how some part of the tech stack worked (“article”) and things hadn’t changed that much, an older article would probably fare better.

  • plz1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    This article is a year old, but relevant because Discord started doing the verifications again. The plan was never canceled, just delayed to a later news cycle. And this will absolutely happen again because there are no consequences.

  • Sibshops@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Storing raw photos feels like storing plaintext passwords. Hackers have access to your password and your photo now.

  • Pika@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m glad you added from 2025 there because otherwise it would have been super deceptive.

    I definitely thought it happened again, and I was gonna be like, well that was fast. Like we all know it’s going to happen again, but that would have been extremely fast.