Summary

Trump has rejected the EU’s “zero-for-zero” tariff offer on cars and industrial goods, demanding instead that the bloc commit to purchasing $350 billion of American energy to offset the trade deficit.

Following his implementation of 20% tariffs on EU goods last week, which triggered significant market downturns, Trump indicated openness to negotiations while emphasizing his “America First” stance.

He also criticized EU product standards as “non-monetary barriers” designed to block American exports.

  • Cryan24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The EU are currently trying the carrot (offering zero for zero), Next comes the stick (targeted import and export tarrifs)… it would hurt the EU, but cripple the US.

    • AwkwardBroccolli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      EU should target the services. US exports services like google, meta etc than goods. If that happens, US goes to depression.

      • Cryan24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That one could be trickier as many Europeans work for the US big service companies ( Microsoft, Google etc…)

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I personally am loving the non-tarrif retaliation by China on the US. Basically banning exports to the US of critical minerals that only they produce. Love to see it.

    • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      EU tariffs alone would not be that painful on their own, but add in Asian tarrifs and perhaps some South American numbers… maybe bring the penguins in too.