Leaders of the European Union have voted to approve a plan to dramatically increase defense spending. The move is a reaction to the U.S. reducing its support for Ukraine in the war against Russia’s invasion. We go to Brussels to understand the ramifications.
And we hear what the series of recent developments in the relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine could mean for peace talks with Russia.
You must log in or register to comment.
I wish all Americans very congratulations on getting Germany to rearm, something you’ve avoided for 70 years
My fellows are so blind and deep in the cult. I genuinely think it’s going to be dictatorship or civil war.
That said, Trump is so effective at being anti-war, that he’s got the entirety of Europe re-arming! 10/10
Stg MAGA’s had a few lines about how Hillary or Kamala would bring us closer to WW3
And you’re only 3 months in! (6%)
Funny enough? The day the government is set to shutdown if not funded… is day 53 of the administration
It only took Hitler 53 days
deleted by creator
That is not true. Both Germanys did rearm in the Cold War and ended up with massive armies.
But it was split in half. First time since the 40s that a United Germany is a military powerhouse
It’s not yet.
Germans are efficient, it won’t take long.
Although I understand the need, the re-armament of Europe makes me sad. Imagine what we could have done with all this money. Research, culture, decarbonisation, social programs, housing… but instead we have to use it on ways to kill people.
Sad really.
This money literally wouldn’t exist otherwise. Or conversely: We could just make up some more money for housing if we wished to, if the powers that be allowed that. The hard limit is never money, the hard limit is willpower and material resources.
But this money is willpower and material resources that could be spent elsewhere : research, culture, decarbonisation, social programs, housing…
Material resources are material resources. Money is a declaration of mutual trust that is created in the central bank’s computers.
I don’t get what you are trying to say? You don’t think this money will be used to use material resources and employ people in weapon industry?
That’s different from what you said before. (“Money is material resources”). Money can be used to buy material resources, but it is not equal to material resources.
Believing the latter leads to the assumption that money is somehow sparse (for governments) and governments should e.g. reduce social or infrastructure spendings to finance the military instead of taking on debt.
I’m very happy that Europe finally is letting go of the US, but yeah, it’s sad to see all this money go to waste.
And nothing from that extra spending will go to US military complex. For what it’s worth it will probably even go down.
