• chewypoops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I don’t disagree with your decision to do this, but this isn’t really offering you any additional protection if you’re not using their products.

      It’s basically just a failsafe for web trackers that don’t get blocked. It isn’t preventing Meta from accessing your personal data if you’re not actively feeding it to them like Muse users are.

      • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        It’s making sure no one using my network can use their products. Do you not have kids or do your kids not have friends?

        Your entire post could have remained a thought in your head and would have been just as useful.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      99% of us are neither, but it’s not like we have a choice. This is the world that’s being thrust upon us, whether we like it or not. All we can do is resist as much as possible, and apply malicious compliance whenever and wherever possible. Make them suffer and pay for it as much as possible, which frankly, isn’t much.

      • RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Create semipermeable intentional communities that center around convivial technology and human empowerment?

        For real, this isn’t going to get better and every day that passes I ask myself “what is this actually buying me? Do I even like this?”

        I know the common refrain is we can’t “bury our heads in the sand” but history tells us that humans take the path of least resistance and that path is the “sloppening”

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ve been wondering this very question since the release of Muse. LLMs can’t keep information hazard secrets. How can we expect them to keep private information from personal accounts separate?

    I assumed they released a product the way Tesla released Autopilot, seeing liability suits as a cost of doing business.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I have a FB account only for a Buy Nothing group, which is way more good than the harm my occasional logging on to FB is creating.

      So you’re wrong.

      • Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        No, I’m not. And Facebook’s shareholders thank you for numbering among their active users.

        You support everything they do.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I was forced to create a Facebook account to buy/sell second hand stuff. No one browses Kijiji, shit just stays there for ages until someone lowballs you 3 months later. Same for LesPACs.

      On Marketplace, my stuff was gone within 2 days.

      Fucking sucks. I really hate Meta. I held out for as long as I could, but if you want to buy / sell second hand goods, the competition is 100% dead, at least in Montreal.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yep, that’s all I use it for. I used to run ads on both Craigslist and FB, but NOBODY looks at Craigslist anymore.

      • Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        You have an account, you count as an active user. Congrats. You are part of their profits.

        Delete the account of support their platform. There is no grey area.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          I’m open to another suggestion regarding buying and selling used goods. As previously stated, I don’t see a viable alternative. All the good stuff is on Marketplace. Very few bother to sell outside of that platform anymore, and few look at other platforms.

          • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I just still use good old Craigslist. The last honest site on the Internet. You know it wasn’t built by AI, because the damn thing hasn’t changed since 1998. It’s absolutely glorious.

              • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                18 days ago

                Ah. I’m sorry. I’ve actually tried to recreate a Meta account just for FB Marketplace reasons, but for some reason the setup process always fails. It just doesn’t work, and I think after a few to many failures (or maybe because I deleted the account), it just seems to lock me out of the process entirely. IDK. Thankfully in my area Craigslist is pretty active.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I got dogpiled for saying it, but Marketplace is remarkably unenshittified. It’s bare bones internet from 2010. The worst thing about it is directing you to ads, or annoyingly pushing you to mail items (where they can take a cut), but compared to the main social feed, it’s much more focused on what you actually want.

        That’s why everyone uses it. If it were actually enshittified, there’s plenty of competitors out there.

        I tried one the other day, but it required a photo ID to sell, so I said naw to that.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Calling marketplace, which requires a login and a scan of your face and probably a blood sample these days, barebones is hilarious. Have you never used Craigslist? It accomplishes the exact same thing and is actually barebones.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          I get dogpiled for saying it, but craigslist was and is fine, and there’s no reason to move off of it

        • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          You’ve given more away to Facebook. If Facebook hasn’t asked for photo ID it’s because its system is confidant it knows who you really are. Other people will be asked for photo ID when signing up for a Facebook account.

    • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I need to send my id to facebook to unlock my account to login if i want to delete it

      • solarspark@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Typical behavior by this company and I expect worse. If it makes you sleep better at night, they probably don’t actually delete accounts when requested. They have ghost profiles, after all.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    I’ve made it a point to give them very little of my data over the years. I recently applied for a job there because I have a friend that works there. Now they know fucking everything about me. I would not put it past them to be keeping data collected from applicant résumés somewhere as well.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    All these things I take as a admission of guilt. They know they are going to break the law but its okay we told you about it before hand.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Meta asking users to hand over bank accounts, email archives and passwords while its own engineers reportedly call a massive breach »inevitable« is quite the sales pitch. At this point, Muse isn’t a personal assistant: it’s a beautifully branded single point of failure with Zuckerberg’s logo on it.

  • melfie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    People are sharing bank accounts and other sensitive data with Meta? Have these people been living under a rock or what?

    • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Could be business side like paying for ads. I think facebook also has built in payment for marketplace which probably takes some fee

    • Living_Dead@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Might be moee like my workplace where the management has decided it’s ok to feed all our files and their emails to AI because it can produce something that looks like work from them.

      No thought to what it could do with that information.

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        My company at least has an enterprise contract with Anthropic where Anthropic pinky promises not to collect the company’s data or train their models on company IP. Given their history of piracy and desperate need for data, I wouldn’t put it past Anthropic to still be collecting company data and training their models on it. Without such a contract in place, though, companies are blatantly just giving away their IP, trade secrets, etc.

        • redballooon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          I only use tokens from pure inference providers. Those that don’t have training in their business model.

        • Living_Dead@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          My company has a similar contract they are willing to believe. I dont trust it for a second, its a machine built on theft of different IPs. If they are willing to steal from everyone everywhere they can for training data then why wouldnt they use the clean data we send to it?

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Whatsapp business data

      marketplace data “Send me the money at xxxxxxxx xx-xx-xx”

      instagram influencer pages

      it’s absurd how much data meta have access to

  • 4grams@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Who the fuck thinks it’s a good idea to give zuck access to their bank accounts? Mass delusion we live with… I’m just gobsmacked…

  • vext01@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    The idea of giving an AI model access to my email or bank account makes my head spin.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      The good news is you don’t have to think about it or hand it over. The AI asks for full disk access and then pulls it all on its own. I hope you don’t have anything private in your machine.

    • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Some people consider large companies to be inside their circle of trust.

      As in “Google is going to protect my privacy by keeping my emails secure”

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Imagine if the guys at the manhattan project were like “there is just NO WAY we’re gonna keep one of these from going off accidentally at some point, it’s INEVITABLE! In fact, ALL of them might go off at once and DESTROY THE WORLD!”

    They probably still would have invented it anyways, but just imagine!

    • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      I think they were pretty sure that’s what was going to happen, but they had to invent the bomb before anyone else in order to have a deterrent.

      • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        This is actually the answer. Zuck, Musk, Pichai, Nadella, Altman, and Amodei all likely understand that AI is not inevitably going to fulfill what they’re promising, but they can’t risk not being in control of a system that could be a single endpoint for nearly all wealth acquisition in the future.

        This is all just billionaire FOMO playing out at that scale.